Literature DB >> 22897121

The source of microbial C has little impact on soil organic matter stabilisation in forest ecosystems.

Heather M Throckmorton1, Jeffrey A Bird2, Laura Dane3, Mary K Firestone3, William R Horwath1.   

Abstract

The source of microbial C is thought to impact its stability in soil due to variations in cellular biochemistry. It has been hypothesised that a fungal-dominated community stabilises more C than a bacterial-dominated community, in part due to chemical recalcitrance of their non-living biomass, particularly cell wall components and pigments. We compared the turnover of (13)C-labelled (99.9 atom %) temperate and tropical microbial isolates [i.e. fungi, Gram-positive bacteria (including actinobacteria) and Gram-negative bacteria] in temperate (California) and tropical (Puerto Rico) forest soils. While significant differences in (13)C recovery and mean residence times occurred among some microbial additions, similar turnover rates were observed, and in general, results do not support the view that microbial biochemistry affects soil C maintenance. Different effects by microbial necromass additions in California and Puerto Rico suggest that ecosystem-specific effects may be as important to microbial C stabilisation as its macromolecular composition and recalcitrance.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22897121     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01848.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  9 in total

1.  Land-use and soil depth affect resource and microbial stoichiometry in a tropical mountain rainforest region of southern Ecuador.

Authors:  Alexander Tischer; Karin Potthast; Ute Hamer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ecosystem scale trade-off in nitrogen acquisition pathways.

Authors:  Meifeng Deng; Lingli Liu; Lin Jiang; Weixing Liu; Xin Wang; Shaopeng Li; Sen Yang; Bin Wang
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Improved model simulation of soil carbon cycling by representing the microbially derived organic carbon pool.

Authors:  Xianlei Fan; Decai Gao; Chunhong Zhao; Chao Wang; Ying Qu; Jing Zhang; Edith Bai
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 11.217

4.  Tradeoffs in microbial carbon allocation may mediate soil carbon storage in future climates.

Authors:  Stephanie N Kivlin; Bonnie G Waring; Colin Averill; Christine V Hawkes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls.

Authors:  Cynthia M Kallenbach; Serita D Frey; A Stuart Grandy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Shift in tree species changes the belowground biota of boreal forests.

Authors:  Sunil Mundra; Håvard Kauserud; Tonje Økland; Jørn-Frode Nordbakken; Yngvild Ransedokken; O Janne Kjønaas
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 10.323

7.  Decomposition of Microbial Necromass Is Divergent at the Individual Taxonomic Level in Soil.

Authors:  Weiling Dong; Alin Song; Huaqun Yin; Xueduan Liu; Jianwei Li; Fenliang Fan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Rhizosphere bacterial carbon turnover is higher in nucleic acids than membrane lipids: implications for understanding soil carbon cycling.

Authors:  Ashish A Malik; Helena Dannert; Robert I Griffiths; Bruce C Thomson; Gerd Gleixner
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Orchard recycling improves climate change adaptation and mitigation potential of almond production systems.

Authors:  Emad Jahanzad; Brent A Holtz; Cameron A Zuber; David Doll; Kelsey M Brewer; Sean Hogan; Amélie C M Gaudin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.