Literature DB >> 22895971

Email for the coordination of healthcare appointments and attendance reminders.

Helen Atherton1, Prescilla Sawmynaden, Barbara Meyer, Josip Car.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Email is a popular and commonly-used method of communication, but its use in health care is not routine. Where email communication has been utilised in health care, its purposes have included the coordination of healthcare appointments and attendance reminders, but the effects of using email in this way are not known. This review considers the use of email for the coordination of healthcare appointments and reminders for attendance; particularly scheduling, rescheduling and cancelling healthcare appointments, and providing prompts/reminders for attendance at appointments.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of using email for the coordination of healthcare appointments and attendance reminders, compared to other forms of coordinating appointments and reminders, on outcomes for health professionals, patients and carers, and health services, including harms. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched: the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2010), MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1950 to January 2010), EMBASE (OvidSP) (1980 to January 2010), PsycINFO (OvidSP) (1967 to January 2010), CINAHL (EbscoHOST) (1982 to February 2010),and ERIC (CSA) (1965 to January 2010). We searched grey literature: theses/dissertation repositories, trials registers and Google Scholar (searched July 2010). We used additional search methods: examining reference lists and contacting authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies of interventions that use email for scheduling health appointments, for reminders for a scheduled health appointment or for ongoing coordination of health appointments and that took the form of 1) unsecured email 2) secure email or 3) web messaging. All healthcare professionals, patients and caregivers in all settings were considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the titles and abstracts of retrieved citations. No studies were identified for inclusion. Consequently, no data collection or analysis was possible. MAIN
RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria, therefore there are no results to report on the use of email for the coordination of healthcare appointments and attendance reminders. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: No conclusions on the effects of using email for the coordination of healthcare appointments and attendance reminders could be made and thus no recommendations for practice can be stipulated. Given the significant theoretical opportunities that email presents, there is a need for rigorous studies addressing the review question, but this may involve addressing barriers concerning trial development and implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22895971     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007981.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  10 in total

Review 1.  Utilizing health information technology to improve vaccine communication and coverage.

Authors:  Melissa S Stockwell; Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Email communication in a developing country: different family physician and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Nisrine N Makarem; Jumana Antoun
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 1.657

3.  Effectiveness of an implementation optimisation intervention aimed at increasing parent engagement in HENRY, a childhood obesity prevention programme - the Optimising Family Engagement in HENRY (OFTEN) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria Bryant; Wendy Burton; Bonnie Cundill; Amanda J Farrin; Jane Nixon; June Stevens; Kim Roberts; Robbie Foy; Harry Rutter; Suzanne Hartley; Sandy Tubeuf; Michelle Collinson; Julia Brown
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Reasons for operation cancellations at a teaching hospital: prioritizing areas of improvement.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abu Abeeleh; Tareq M Tareef; Amjad Bani Hani; Nader Albsoul; Omar Q Samarah; M S ElMohtaseb; Musa Alshehabat; Zuhair Bani Ismail; Omar Alnoubani; Salameh S Obeidat; Sami Abu Halawa
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Impact of health portal enrolment with email reminders at an academic rheumatology clinic.

Authors:  Arielle Mendel; Shirley Chow
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2017-03-07

6.  Lay health supporters aided by mobile text messaging to improve adherence, symptoms, and functioning among people with schizophrenia in a resource-poor community in rural China (LEAN): A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dong Roman Xu; Shuiyuan Xiao; Hua He; Eric D Caine; Stephen Gloyd; Jane Simoni; James P Hughes; Juan Nie; Meijuan Lin; Wenjun He; Yeqing Yuan; Wenjie Gong
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Information and Communication Technologies in Lung Transplantation: Perception of Patients and Medical Teams.

Authors:  Sébastien Chanoine; Christelle Roch; Léa Liaigre; Matthieu Roustit; Céline Genty; Elisa Vitale; Jean-Luc Bosson; Christophe Pison; Benoît Allenet; Pierrick Bedouch
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 8.  Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles.

Authors:  Sionnadh Mairi McLean; Andrew Booth; Melanie Gee; Sarah Salway; Mark Cobb; Sadiq Bhanbhro; Susan A Nancarrow
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  The effect of fines on nonattendance in public hospital outpatient clinics: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emely Ek Blæhr; Thomas Kristensen; Ulla Væggemose; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland.

Authors:  Jonathan Dash; Dagmar M Haller; Johanna Sommer; Noelle Junod Perron
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.