Literature DB >> 22895102

The role of G-proteins in plant immunity.

Huajian Zhang1, Zhimou Gao, Xiaobo Zheng, Zhengguang Zhang.   

Abstract

Heterotrimeric G-proteins play an important regulatory role in multiple physiological processes, including the plant immune response, and substantial progress has been made in elucidating the G-protein-mediated defense-signaling network. This mini-review discusses the importance of G-proteins in plant immunity. We also provide an overview of how G-proteins affect plant cell death and stomatal movement. Our recent studies demonstrated that G-proteins are involved in signal transduction and induction of stomatal closure and defense responses. We also discuss future directions for G-protein signaling studies involving plant immunity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22895102      PMCID: PMC3493415          DOI: 10.4161/psb.21431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


Unlike animals, plants do not have specified cells and an adaptive immune system to defend themselves against pathogens. Instead, every living plant cell is generally equipped with the components necessary to detect invading pathogens and produce systemic signals at the infection site. The plant basal immune system (PTI) is triggered by microbe-/pathogen-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs) and elicitors., PTI provides the first level of induced defense against an invading pathogen. This non-race-specific basal resistance, together with constitutive physical and chemical barriers, successfully prevents most infections from becoming established. To overcome PTI, pathogens have evolved a repertoire of virulence effector proteins that are delivered into hosts to suppress PTI. In turn, plants have evolved Resistance (R) proteins, each of which recognizes the action of specific virulent effector(s) as a signal of invasion to trigger plant resistance through effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Natural selection drives the evolution of new pathogen effector proteins and plant R proteins. This tug-of-war between plants and pathogens is represented as a zig–zag–zig model.- Both PTI and ETI induce stomatal closure and a hypersensitive response (HR), a programmed host cell death (PCD), to limit pathogen development. Recent studies have advanced our understanding of plant immunity, and a key player was found to be the heterotrimeric G-protein (G-protein). In this review, we focus on recent studies that have expanded our understanding of the role of G-proteins in plant immunity with a particular emphasis on G-protein-mediated cell death signaling and G-protein-mediated stomatal closure.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins: The players

The regulatory mechanisms of plant immunity have been extensively explored in yeast, metazoans, and plants. G-proteins are highly conserved in eukaryotes, and yeast also contains a major G-protein sensor. The heterotrimeric G-protein complex is minimally composed of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits. Classically, the G-protein heterotrimer is activated by cell-surface receptors (G-protein-coupled receptors, GPCRs) that trigger the Gα subunit of the heterotrimer to release GDP, thus enabling the Gα subunit to bind GTP. GTP binding is accompanied by structural rearrangements that disengage the Gβγ interaction and result in heterotrimer dissociation.- The free subunits then relay signals by interacting with downstream proteins collectively called effectors because they “effect” the cellular changes discussed above. G-protein signaling is terminated after the Gα subunit hydrolyzes GTP to GDP and the heterotrimer reassociates. Gα proteins provide specificity between GPCRs and effectors, amplify signal transduction, serve as a point of signal modulation, and act as timing devices that control signaling life spans. Metazoans have hundreds of GPCRs as well as dozens of effectors, modulators, and scaffold proteins that interact with the heterotrimer or its dissociated subunits. However, few of these are encoded in plant genomes sequenced to date. Our understanding of G-protein signaling in plants depends on understanding the proteins operating in this network and the relationship between each effector. Currently, some conserved plant immunity regulators such as MAPKKKα, BcLCB2, CaMBL1, NtLRP1, CaPIK1, CaRING1, HSP90, 14–3-3, CaMsrB2, MKK1 and VPE have been identified in Nicotiana benthamiana and other plants.- In addition to the conserved counterparts of mammalian immunity regulators, unexpected plant immunity mediators have also been identified in plants. However, G-protein signaling is poorly characterized in Arabidopsis and other plants relative to information regarding yeast and animal systems, and little is known about processes downstream of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins: Activators of plant cell death

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are involved in transducing extracellular signals from cell surface receptors into intracellular effectors. Although plants have only a small number of genes encoding the G-protein subunits, they have been implicated in a wide variety of biological processes. The higher plant Arabidopsis has only one canonical G-protein α-subunit (Gα), one β-subunit (Gβ), and three γ-subunits (Gγ). However, only two Gγ were found in monocot rice species. Similarly, based on N. benthamiana sequence information, it contains a single candidate Gα gene and possibly two Gβ-subunit genes. We previously used virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) to investigate the role of Gα, Gβ1, and Gβ2 in N. benthamiana responses to elicitors from fungi, bacteria, and oomycetes. In the canonical heterotrimeric protein in N. benthamiana, both the Gα and Gβ2 subunits are related to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation triggered by elicitors. Neither boehmerin nor the Nep1-induced hypersensitive response requires a functional heterotrimeric G-protein. Only harpin-triggered cell death is compromised in Gα- and Gβ2-silenced plants, suggesting that Gα and Gβ2 play a role in harpin-induced cell death. This suggests that H2O2 plays different roles in cell death induced by various elicitors. Although not all G-protein subunits are involved in elicitor-induced cell death, all gene-silenced plants show decreased PR2b, EDS1, NbrbohA, and NbrbohB expression, indicating that G-proteins positively regulate defense-related genes in plant defense signaling. Both the Gα and Gβ subunits are necessary for the rapid initial component of the biphasic oxidative burst, but only the Gα protein is required for ozone (O3)-induced cell death in Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis Gβ is involved in unfolded protein response-associated cell death. All three regular subunits of the Arabidopsis G-protein play roles in disease resistance. The Arabidopsis gpα1 mutant exhibited enhanced resistance to several necrotrophic fungal pathogens, including Plectosphaerella cucumerina, Alternaria brassicicola, and Fusarium oxysporum., In contrast, mutations in AGB1 and AGG1 enhanced plant susceptibility to necrotrophic fungal pathogens.- These results suggested that the Gα subunit is a negative regulator, while Gβ and Gγ are positive regulators of disease resistance. However, the rice Gα loss-of-function mutation (the d1 mutation) compromises resistance against an avirulent strain of the biotrophic fungal pathogen Magnaporthe grisea, which causes rice blast. The d1 mutant is impaired in the hypersensitive response, H2O2 production, and defense gene induction triggered by pathogens. In Arabidopsis, neither the Gα nor the Gβ mutation alters resistance to virulent or avirulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae, a biotrophic bacterial pathogen. These studies suggest that the role of G-proteins in plant disease resistance depends on the type of pathogen (necrotropic vs. biotrophic and bacterial vs. fungal) and that the different G-protein subunits may have different functions. The molecular mechanism by which the various subunits of G-proteins affect disease resistance remains unclear. Heterotrimeric G-proteins were identified as early mediators of stress signaling., Arabidopsis plants deficient in the Gβ subunit of the heterotrimeric G-protein were more susceptible to O3 damage and displayed higher rates of leaf cell death than plants deficient in Gα. In contrast, Arabidopsis plants lacking the Gβ subunit displayed greater resistance to leaf cell death triggered by tunicamycin, whereas mutants lacking the Gα subunit were as susceptible as wild type. This difference in response may be due to differential localization and unique functions of the Gα and Gβ subunits. While the Gα protein was present at approximately equal amounts in the plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the Gβ protein was more abundant in the ER. Tunicamycin induces ER stress, and Gβ may specifically play a role in control of the ER stress response. And pea Gβ subunit plays an important role in stress signal transduction and development pathways via interacting with a wide range of proteins of multiple functions., In addition, the PAMP derived from bacterial flagellin, flg22-triggered PTI involves K+ channel regulation, and this regulation is dependent on signaling via cognate PAMP receptors and a heterotrimeric G-protein. In Arabidopsis seedlings, phytochrome-dependent cell death is mediated by the heterotrimeric G-protein. In hypocotyls of far-red grown seedlings that were subsequently exposed to white light, a heterotrimeric G-protein played a role in phytochrome A-mediated signaling, leading to far-red irradiation preconditioned cell death. The gpα1 mutant showed decreased cell death compared with the wild type, while in the Gβ mutant agb1, cell death increased, suggesting that Gα and Gβ play antagonistic roles in this cell death pathway. In addition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated this cell death pathway. And GPA1 inhibits guard cell photosynthesis and promotes the availability of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in guard cells. Moreover, agb1 was more sensitive to H2O2 than wild-type seedlings, indicating that G-protein may play a role in seedling susceptibility to H2O2 stress. Heterotrimeric G-proteins regulate cell death, and their diverse roles have been studied in various plant species. However, no information is available on the functions of G-protein genes that are differentially expressed in epidermal cells above adventitious roots. Their role in cell death, cell type specification, or other cellular processes remains unknown. Epidermal cell death in rice is induced by ethylene and H2O2 and accompanied by transcriptional regulation in response to pro-death signals. Previous studies have identified G-protein signaling through Gα (D1) as an essential step in epidermal cell death signaling. Since no genes encoding G-proteins or G-protein regulatory proteins were transcriptionally controlled in dying epidermal cells after treatment with ethylene or H2O2, we conclude that heterotrimeric G-protein activity is regulated posttranscriptionally. While cell death rates were strongly reduced in d1, some gene regulation was still observed in response to ethylene or H2O2, indicating that D1 may act downstream of transcriptional regulation.

Heterotrimeric G-proteins: Mediators of stomatal closure signaling

Regulation of the stomatal aperture in plants controls photosynthesis and water status., Since mature guard cells lack plasmodesmata, all solute uptake and efflux must occur via the plasma membrane and vacuole. Historically, stomata were considered a passive portal for the entry of pathogenic bacteria, but recent studies have suggested that the stomata play an active role in the plant innate immune system.- Stomatal closure restricts bacterial invasion, although plant pathogenic bacteria can secrete specific virulence factors to reopen stomata, which is an important pathogenic strategy. Moreover, some fungal phytopathogens, in addition to bacteria, force entry through closed stomata, whereas others require open stomata to successfully penetrate plants. Some fungi and oomycetes can manipulate stomata to facilitate sporulation., Stomatal closure can be triggered by biotic (e.g., pathogens, PAMPs, elicitors) and abiotic stresses [e.g., water deficiency, cold, light, abscisic acid (ABA)]. Thus, identifying the G-protein subunits that control stomatal closure during PTI is important. All three subunit types are expressed in guard cells. Ubiquitous expression of GPA1 throughout plants was confirmed using northern blotting, and promoter::GUS analyses and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results also supported guard cell expression.- AGB1 is ubiquitously expressed throughout the plant, and its promoter::GUS transgenic lines show strong expression in guard cells.,, For Gγ subunits, RNA gel blots show AGG1 and AGG2 expression throughout the plant; however, reporter gene analyses have shown guard cell expression of AGG2 but not AGG1.,, The guard cell expression of G-protein subunits suggests that G-proteins play a role in guard cell signaling and stomatal movement regulation. Using electrophysiological and pharmacological methods, G-proteins were found to regulate stomatal movements in beans (Vicia faba). With the sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome and identification of G-protein encoding genes, the acquisition and characterization of mutants lacking functional heterotrimeric G-proteins facilitated direct examination of the roles of heterotrimeric G-proteins in the regulation of stomatal movements. Overall, ABA is the best-studied regulator of stomatal movements. ABA inhibits stomatal opening and promotes stomatal closure, reducing transpirational water loss. Electrophysiological experiments using G-protein modulators, phytohormones, and G-protein mutants have strongly suggested that heterotrimeric G-proteins are involved in the regulation of stomatal movements in ABA signaling.- And global transcriptome found many genes are cross-regulated by ABA and G-protein in guard cells. We studied the elicitor signal-transduction pathway in plants using three elicitors (bacterial harpin, fungal Nep1, and oomycete boehmerin) in N. benthamiana because such a simple experimental system provides an excellent model based on virus-induced gene silencing.,- N. benthamiana genes encoding Gα and Gβ subunits of the G-protein were identified. Gα, Gβ1, and Gβ2 silencing could be used to directly study the involvement of heterotrimeric G-proteins in the regulation of stomatal movements. Gα, Gβ1, and Gβ2 silencing inhibited elicitor-induced stomatal closure, suggesting that both the Gα and Gβ subunits are involved in stomatal closure triggered by elicitors. Furthermore, in guard cells of Gα, Gβ1, and Gβ2 silenced plants, elicitor-triggered NO accumulation was abolished. This suggested that G-protein signaling was required to activate the intracellular sources of NO and contributes to the elicitor-induced stomatal closure in N. benthamiana.

Perspectives

Heterotrimeric G-proteins play a central role in plant signal transduction. Recently, the direct involvement of G-proteins in defense responses has been shown using elegant biochemical and genetic analyses, although the role of G-proteins in plant defense signaling remains unknown and a systematic analysis of the genes involved in the pathway has yet to be completed. Therefore, combining various genetic, reverse genetic, and biochemical techniques is important to identify receptors, scaffold proteins, negative regulators, and to target effectors that will increase our understanding of these plant defense mechanisms. Recent studies suggest that PCD and stomatal closure are integral components of plant immunity. Pathogens can produce virulence proteins to suppress PCD and stomatal closure, and plants in turn evolve disease-resistance proteins to recognize these virulence effectors. In the future, elucidating how different pathogen virulence factors inhibit PCD and stomatal closure will be important. An in-depth investigation will greatly increase our understanding of innate immune signaling and facilitate the discovery of methods to manage plant disease.
  62 in total

Review 1.  The role of vacuolar processing enzymes in plant immunity.

Authors:  Huajian Zhang; Xiaobo Zheng; Zhengguang Zhang
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 2.  Early signaling events induced by elicitors of plant defenses.

Authors:  Angela Garcia-Brugger; Olivier Lamotte; Elodie Vandelle; Stéphane Bourque; David Lecourieux; Benoit Poinssot; David Wendehenne; Alain Pugin
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 3.  Roles of ion channels and transporters in guard cell signal transduction.

Authors:  Sona Pandey; Wei Zhang; Sarah M Assmann
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  The pepper mannose-binding lectin gene CaMBL1 is required to regulate cell death and defense responses to microbial pathogens.

Authors:  In Sun Hwang; Byung Kook Hwang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Plant stomata: a checkpoint of host immunity and pathogen virulence.

Authors:  Weiqing Zeng; Maeli Melotto; Sheng Yang He
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Isolation of cDNAs encoding guanine nucleotide-binding protein beta-subunit homologues from maize (ZGB1) and Arabidopsis (AGB1).

Authors:  C A Weiss; C W Garnaat; K Mukai; Y Hu; H Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rice 14-3-3 protein (GF14e) negatively affects cell death and disease resistance.

Authors:  Patricia M Manosalva; Myron Bruce; Jan E Leach
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Oxalate production by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum deregulates guard cells during infection.

Authors:  Rejane L Guimarães; Henrik U Stotz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  The LCB2 subunit of the sphingolip biosynthesis enzyme serine palmitoyltransferase can function as an attenuator of the hypersensitive response and Bax-induced cell death.

Authors:  Yunzhe Gan; Lisha Zhang; Zhengguang Zhang; Suomeng Dong; Jun Li; Yuanchao Wang; Xiaobo Zheng
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Evolution of a signaling nexus constrained by protein interfaces and conformational States.

Authors:  Brenda R S Temple; Corbin D Jones; Alan M Jones
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  14 in total

1.  Characterization of the heterotrimeric G-protein complex and its regulator from the green alga Chara braunii expands the evolutionary breadth of plant G-protein signaling.

Authors:  Dieter Hackenberg; Hidetoshi Sakayama; Tomoaki Nishiyama; Sona Pandey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  A novel protein elicitor (SsCut) from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum induces multiple defense responses in plants.

Authors:  Huajian Zhang; Qun Wu; Shun Cao; Tongyao Zhao; Ling Chen; Peitong Zhuang; Xiuhong Zhou; Zhimou Gao
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Fine mapping of QTL conferring Cercospora leaf spot disease resistance in mungbean revealed TAF5 as candidate gene for the resistance.

Authors:  Chutintorn Yundaeng; Prakit Somta; Jingbin Chen; Xingxing Yuan; Sompong Chankaew; Xin Chen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Concurrent overexpression of rice G-protein β and γ subunits provide enhanced tolerance to sheath blight disease and abiotic stress in rice.

Authors:  Durga Madhab Swain; Ranjan Kumar Sahoo; Ravindra Kumar Chandan; Srayan Ghosh; Rahul Kumar; Gopaljee Jha; Narendra Tuteja
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.540

5.  Identification of Nicotiana benthamiana microRNAs and their targets using high throughput sequencing and degradome analysis.

Authors:  Ivett Baksa; Tibor Nagy; Endre Barta; Zoltán Havelda; Éva Várallyay; Dániel Silhavy; József Burgyán; György Szittya
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Chickpea-Fusarium oxysporum interaction transcriptome reveals differential modulation of plant defense strategies.

Authors:  Medha L Upasani; Bhakti M Limaye; Gayatri S Gurjar; Sunitha M Kasibhatla; Rajendra R Joshi; Narendra Y Kadoo; Vidya S Gupta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Shoot the Message, Not the Messenger-Combating Pathogenic Virulence in Plants by Inhibiting Quorum Sensing Mediated Signaling Molecules.

Authors:  Ganesh Alagarasan; Kumar S Aswathy
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Disease Resistance Mechanisms in Plants.

Authors:  Ethan J Andersen; Shaukat Ali; Emmanuel Byamukama; Yang Yen; Madhav P Nepal
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Comparative transcriptome analysis of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) and one of its wild relatives Cajanus platycarpus (Benth.) Maesen.

Authors:  Maniraj Rathinam; Pragya Mishra; Madavan Vasudevan; Roli Budhwar; Ajay Mahato; A Lakshmi Prabha; Nagendra Kumar Singh; Uma Rao; Rohini Sreevathsa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G-proteins play a critical role in host and nonhost resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pathogens.

Authors:  Seonghee Lee; Clemencia M Rojas; Yasuhiro Ishiga; Sona Pandey; Kirankumar S Mysore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.