Literature DB >> 22894451

Dosimetric aspects of inverse-planned modulated-arc total-body irradiation.

Mareike Held1, Neil Kirby, Olivier Morin, Jean Pouliot.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop optimal beam parameters and to verify the dosimetric aspects of the recently developed modulated-arc total-body irradiation (MATBI) technique, which delivers an inverse-planned dose to the entire body using gantry rotation.
METHODS: The patient is positioned prone and supine underneath the gantry at about 2 m source-to-surface distance (SSD). Then, up to 28 beams irradiate the patient from different gantry angles. Based on full-body computed-tomography (CT) images of the patient, the weight of each beam is optimized, using inverse planning, to create a uniform body dose. This study investigates how to best simulate patients and the ideal beam setup parameters, such as field size, number of beams, and beam geometry, for treatment time and dose homogeneity. In addition, three anthropomorphic water phantoms were constructed and utilized to verify the accuracy of dose delivery, with both diode array and ion chamber measurements. Furthermore, to improve the accuracy of the new technique, a beam model is created specifically for the extended-SSD positioning for MATBI.
RESULTS: Low dose CT scans can be utilized for dose calculations without affecting the accuracy. The largest field size of 40 × 40 cm(2) was found to deliver the most uniform dose in the least amount of time. Moreover, a higher number of beams improves dose homogeneity. The average dose discrepancy between ion chamber measurements and extended-SSD beam model calculations was 1.2%, with the largest discrepancy being 3.2%. This average dose discrepancy was 1.4% with the standard beam model for delivery at isocenter.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimum beam setup parameters, regarding dose uniformity and treatment duration, are laid out for modulated-arc TBI. In addition, the presented dose measurements show that these treatments can be delivered accurately. These measurements also indicated that a new beam model did not significantly improve the accuracy of dose calculations. The optimum beam setup parameters along with the measurements performed to ensure accurate dose delivery serve as a useful guide for the clinical implementation of MATBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894451     DOI: 10.1118/1.4739250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Accelerating total body irradiation with large field modulated arc therapy in standard treatment rooms without additional equipment.

Authors:  Martin Polednik; Frank Lohr; Michael Ehmann; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Total body irradiation with step translation and dynamic field matching.

Authors:  Ho-Hsing Chen; Jay Wu; Keh-Shih Chuang; Jia-Fu Lin; Jia-Cheng Lee; Jin-Ching Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Modification of a modulated arc total body irradiation technique: Implementation and first clinical experience for paediatric patients.

Authors:  Melanie Pemberton; Carole Brady; Beth Taylor; Danielle Tyrrell; Lucy Sim; Sylwia Zawlodzka-Bednarz; Jennifer Biggs; Mitchell Peters; John Baines; Catriona Hargrave
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-09-19

4.  Considerations and adaptions to the modulated arc total body irradiation technique: dosimetry description.

Authors:  Beth Effeney; Jennifer Biggs; Carole Brady; Melanie Pemberton; Lucy Sim; Andrew Pullar
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-11-06

5.  Dosimetric Evaluation Between the Conventional Volumetrically Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) Total Body Irradiation (TBI) and the Novel Simultaneous Integrated Total Marrow Approach (SIMBa) VMAT TBI.

Authors:  Dennis Stanley; Kristen McConnell; Zohaib Iqbal; Ashlyn Everett; Jonathan Dodson; Kimberly Keene; Andrew McDonald
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.