Literature DB >> 22894225

Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin.

Patricia Keating1, Grace Kuo.   

Abstract

To determine if the speaking fundamental frequency (F0) profiles of English and Mandarin differ, a variety of voice samples from male and female speakers were compared. The two languages' F0 profiles were sometimes found to differ, but these differences depended on the particular speech samples being compared. Most notably, the physiological F0 ranges of the speakers, determined from tone sweeps, hardly differed between the two languages, indicating that the English and Mandarin speakers' voices are comparable. Their use of F0 in single-word utterances was, however, quite different, with the Mandarin speakers having higher maximums and means, and larger ranges, even when only the Mandarin high falling tone was compared with English. In contrast, for a prose passage, the two languages were more similar, differing only in the mean F0, Mandarin again being higher. The study thus contributes to the growing literature showing that languages can differ in their F0 profile, but highlights the fact that the choice of speech materials to compare can be critical.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894225     DOI: 10.1121/1.4730893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots.

Authors:  Caleb Everett; Damián E Blasi; Seán G Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Vocal Fundamental Frequency and Sound Pressure Level in Charismatic Speech: A Cross-Gender and -Language Study.

Authors:  Rosario Signorello; Didier Demolin; Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni; Bruce R Gerratt; Zhaoyan Zhang; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Modeling empathy as synchrony in clinician and patient vocally encoded emotional arousal: A failure to replicate.

Authors:  Jacques Gaume; Kevin A Hallgren; Carole Clair; Marianne Schmid Mast; Valérie Carrard; David C Atkins
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2019-01-31

4.  A language-familiarity effect for speaker discrimination without comprehension.

Authors:  David Fleming; Bruno L Giordano; Roberto Caldara; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Statistical learning of a tonal language: the influence of bilingualism and previous linguistic experience.

Authors:  Tianlin Wang; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-03

6.  Electro-tactile stimulation (ETS) enhances cochlear-implant Mandarin tone recognition.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Janice Chang; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-03

7.  Human cortical encoding of pitch in tonal and non-tonal languages.

Authors:  Yuanning Li; Claire Tang; Junfeng Lu; Jinsong Wu; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Production and Perception of Tone 3 Focus in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yong-Cheol Lee; Ting Wang; Mark Liberman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-26

9.  A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men's vocal pitch and facial hair.

Authors:  Tamsin K Saxton; Lauren L Mackey; Kristofor McCarty; Nick Neave
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Effects of Minerva Orthosis on Larynx Height in Young, Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Pegah Saddat Hosseini; Mohammad Taghi Karimi; Saeideh Moayedfar; Marzieh Golabbakhsh; Fatemeh Abnavi
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2017-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.