PURPOSE: Health system performance depends on production and use of quality health data and information. Routine health information systems (RHIS) are defined as systems that provide information at regular intervals of a year or less to meet predictable information needs. These include paper-based or electronic health records and facility- and district-level management information systems. RHIS are receiving increasing attention as an essential component of efficient, country-owned, integrated national systems. To guide investment decisions on RHIS, evidence is needed on which types of RHIS interventions work and which do not. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This chapter is a systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of RHIS interventions in low- and middle-income countries, starting from the premise that investments in RHIS could be better understood and so produce greater benefits than they currently do. FINDINGS: We describe the conceptual literature on the determinants of RHIS performance and its role in improving health systems functioning, discuss the evidence base on the effectiveness of strategies to improve RHIS performance, provide an overview of RHIS evaluation challenges, and make suggestions to improve the evidence base. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The goal is to help ensure that (a) RHIS interventions are appropriately designed and implemented to improve health systems functioning and (b) resulting RHIS information is used more effectively.
PURPOSE: Health system performance depends on production and use of quality health data and information. Routine health information systems (RHIS) are defined as systems that provide information at regular intervals of a year or less to meet predictable information needs. These include paper-based or electronic health records and facility- and district-level management information systems. RHIS are receiving increasing attention as an essential component of efficient, country-owned, integrated national systems. To guide investment decisions on RHIS, evidence is needed on which types of RHIS interventions work and which do not. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This chapter is a systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of RHIS interventions in low- and middle-income countries, starting from the premise that investments in RHIS could be better understood and so produce greater benefits than they currently do. FINDINGS: We describe the conceptual literature on the determinants of RHIS performance and its role in improving health systems functioning, discuss the evidence base on the effectiveness of strategies to improve RHIS performance, provide an overview of RHIS evaluation challenges, and make suggestions to improve the evidence base. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The goal is to help ensure that (a) RHIS interventions are appropriately designed and implemented to improve health systems functioning and (b) resulting RHIS information is used more effectively.
Authors: Rifqah A Roomaney; Victoria Pillay-van Wyk; Oluwatoyin F Awotiwon; Edward Nicol; Jané D Joubert; Debbie Bradshaw; Lyn A Hanmer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Mary Amoakoh-Coleman; Gbenga A Kayode; Charles Brown-Davies; Irene Akua Agyepong; Diederick E Grobbee; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Evelyn K Ansah Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-04-01
Authors: Claire Harris; Kelly Allen; Cara Waller; Tim Dyer; Vanessa Brooke; Marie Garrubba; Angela Melder; Catherine Voutier; Anthony Gust; Dina Farjou Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jieun Lee; Caroline A Lynch; Lauren Oliveira Hashiguchi; Robert W Snow; Naomi D Herz; Jayne Webster; Justin Parkhurst; Ngozi A Erondu Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-06
Authors: Elesban Kihuba; David Gathara; Stephen Mwinga; Mercy Mulaku; Rose Kosgei; Wycliffe Mogoa; Rachel Nyamai; Mike English Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 2.640