Literature DB >> 22893226

Relationship between price paid for off-trade alcohol, alcohol consumption and income in England: a cross-sectional survey.

Mike J Crawford1, Alexander M H Parry, Adam R W Weston, Dionysis Seretis, Maria Zauter-Tutt, Abrar Hussain, Pardis Mostajabi, Rahil Sanatinia, Bernard North.   

Abstract

AIMS: In order to examine the potential impact of an increase in the minimum price per unit of alcohol to 50 pence ($0.78), we examined drinking patterns and household incomes of people who purchase alcohol in England at above and below this price.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of 515 members of the public in seven towns and cities in the south of England. The primary outcome was whether the participant had purchased alcohol at <50 p/unit. The main exposures were annual household income and alcohol consumption, measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C).
RESULTS: The median price paid per unit of alcohol was 53.1 pence (range 16.4-297.0 pence). Those buying alcohol at <50 p/unit had a mean AUDIT-C score of 6.2 compared with 5.5 among those buying alcohol at above this price. The odds ratio (OR) of a person on low income with high-risk drinking purchasing alcohol at <50 p/unit was 1.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-1.79] compared with all other study participants. The OR of a person on low income with low-risk drinking purchasing alcohol below this price was 0.51 (95% CI = 0.30-0.87) compared with all other participants.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that an increase in the minimum price of alcohol to 50 pence price per unit is only likely to disproportionately affect people on low incomes if their alcohol consumption is excessive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22893226     DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/ags091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for the effectiveness of minimum pricing of alcohol: a systematic review and assessment using the Bradford Hill criteria for causality.

Authors:  Sadie Boniface; Jack W Scannell; Sally Marlow
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol.

Authors:  Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Clare Beeston; Andrew Millard; Ross Forsyth; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Douglas Eadie; Lesley Graham; Shona Hilton; Anne Ludbrook; Gerry McCartney; Thomas Phillips; Martine Stead; Allison Ford; Lyndal Bond; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data.

Authors:  Anurag Sharma; Brian Vandenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How might the alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) impact upon local off-sales shops and the communities which they serve?

Authors:  Alasdair J M Forsyth; Anne Ellaway; Neil Davidson
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  Minimum pricing of alcohol versus volumetric taxation: which policy will reduce heavy consumption without adversely affecting light and moderate consumers?

Authors:  Anurag Sharma; Brian Vandenberg; Bruce Hollingsworth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.