Literature DB >> 22892606

25-gauge vitrectomy versus intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: 1 year follow-up.

Tatsuhiko Sato1, Kosaku Sawada, Chiharu Iwahashi-Shima, Hajime Bando, Toshihide Ikeda, Kazuyuki Emi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy of 25-gauge vitrectomy to that of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 46 eyes of 46 consecutive patients were reviewed. Twenty-seven eyes underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy (VIT Group) and 19 eyes received 1.25 mg of IVB (IVB Group). The best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) in logarithm of minimum angle resolution units and central macular thicknesses (CMTs) were evaluated before and 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the pre-treatment BCVA and CMT between the 2 groups. In the VIT Group, the preoperative BCVA was 0.59 and the CMT was 587.3 μm and the BCVA was 0.35 and the CMT was 286.6 μm, 12 months after the vitrectomy. Both values were significantly (P <0.05) better at 12 months than the preoperative values. In the IVB Group, the average number of IVB was 2.4 during the 1-year period. The BCVA was 0.69 and the CMT was 590.9 μm before the IVB, and the BCVA was 0.36 and the CMT was 360.1 μm, 12 months after the initial IVB. The improvements of these 2 parameters were significant (P <0.05) at 12 months after the initial IVB. The differences in the BCVA and CMT at 12 months between the 2 groups were not significant.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the 25-gauge vitrectomy and IVB have similar effects in improving the BCVA and CMT in eyes with ME secondary to BRVO. However, IVB often required several injections to preserve the improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22892606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  3 in total

1.  Current practice in the management of branch retinal vein occlusion in Japan: Survey results of retina specialists in Japan.

Authors:  Yuichiro Ogura; Mineo Kondo; Kazuaki Kadonosono; Masahiko Shimura; Motohiro Kamei; Akitaka Tsujikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Outcomes of microincision vitrectomy surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Shimpei Sato; Maiko Inoue; Shin Yamane; Akira Arakawa; Mikiro Mori; Kazuaki Kadonosono
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-04

3.  Long-term outcomes of intravitreous bevacizumab or tissue plasminogen activator or vitrectomy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kumagai; Nobuchika Ogino; Marie Fukami; Mariko Furukawa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.