Literature DB >> 22892584

A framework for encouraging patient engagement in medical decision making.

Christine G Holzmueller1, Albert W Wu, Peter J Pronovost.   

Abstract

Patients have a right to make decisions about their medical care because they have the most at stake. Although current social forces and policies press for greater patient participation, there is little guidance on how physicians can comply. This paper describes the current culture influencing the physician-patient relationship, offers a practical framework and strategies to physicians to engage patients in medical decision making, and discusses the implications for patient safety. We describe several barriers that make patient involvement difficult to practice, such as differences between models that define the roles of both parties in the relationship. Arguably, patients should make all medical care decisions, but there are situations when this is not feasible. Nonetheless, there is a greater imperative for patient decision making if there are multiple treatment options; if the alternatives differ relative to clinical, quality-of-life, or financial outcomes; or if there are different clinical risks and benefits. We offer 3 strategies to encourage patients to make medical decisions and suggest implications for the field of patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22892584     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318267c56e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  9 in total

1.  Association between Internet use and decision-making preference in older adults.

Authors:  Maan Isabella Cajita; Erin Whitehouse; Chakra Budhathoki; Nancy Hodgson
Journal:  Gerontechnology       Date:  2016

Review 2.  The SDM 3 Circle Model: A Literature Synthesis and Adaptation for Shared Decision Making in the Hospital.

Authors:  Stephanie Rennke; Patrick Yuan; Brad Monash; Rebecca Blankenburg; Ian Chua; Stephanie Harman; Debbie S Sakai; Adeena Khan; Joan F Hilton; Lisa Shieh; Jason Satterfield
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of Patient and Family Engagement: The "Foundation" of the Medical "Home".

Authors:  Crystal W Cené; Beverley H Johnson; Nora Wells; Beverly Baker; Renee Davis; Renee Turchi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A scoping review of person and family engagement in the context of multiple chronic conditions.

Authors:  Judith B Vick; Jennifer L Wolff
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.734

5.  Patient-Centered Communication.

Authors:  Cynthia A Naughton
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-13

6.  Functioning and quality of life in Dutch oldest old with diverse levels of dependency.

Authors:  Riaan Botes; Karin M Vermeulen; Antonie M Gerber; Adelita V Ranchor; Erik Buskens
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 7.  Patient and Health Professional Perspectives about Engaging Patients in Addressing Patient Safety: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Zahra Chegini; Morteza Arab-Zozani; Ali Janati
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-14

8.  The relationship between patient engagement and health-related quality of life in patients: a cross-sectional study in general outpatient clinic in Hong Kong SAR, China.

Authors:  Richard Huan Xu; Annie Wai Ling Cheung; Eliza Lai Yi Wong
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Doctors' insights into the patient perspective: a qualitative study in the field of chronic pain.

Authors:  Claudia Zanini; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Fabiola Atzeni; Manuela Di Franco; Sara Rubinelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.