Literature DB >> 22892183

Promoting farmer engagement and activity in the control of dairy cattle lameness.

H R Whay1, Z E Barker, K A Leach, D C J Main.   

Abstract

Many 'influencers' allied to the agricultural industry support farmers to implement management changes that affect animal welfare. Developing approaches to working with farmers that achieve both engagement and subsequently management changes is critical. As an example, the generation of action points and implementation of change to control dairy cattle lameness is reported and discussed here. Action plans were generated on farms receiving both lameness monitoring and intervention support (MS group; n=117) as part of a 3 year intervention project. At the start of year 1, MS farmers received action planning advice from a veterinary surgeon, and then at the start of years 2 and 3, farmers generated their own lameness control action plans with facilitator support. Engagement was achieved with 114 MS farmers who generated 692 action points in total. Two hundred and sixteen of these resulted from veterinary advice and 476 were generated by the farmers with facilitator support. In terms of activity, MS farms implemented a mean of 8.22 changes per farm as compared to 6.77 on farms which only received annual lameness monitoring (MO group; n=72). While these levels of change were similar, fewer changes implemented on the MS farms (8.5%) were judged 'likely to increase the risk of lameness' compared to the MO farms (16.5%). Farmers generated substantial numbers of lameness control action points for their own farms aided by a facilitator and, crucially, veterinary or facilitator involvement reduced changes that were likely to compromise lameness control.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22892183     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  5 in total

1.  Training veterinarians and agricultural advisers on a novel tool for tail biting prevention.

Authors:  A L Vom Brocke; D P Madey; M Gauly; L Schrader; S Dippel
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2015-02-07

2.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Francisca C Velkers; Lisa Fijn; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  The Importance of the Social Sciences in Reducing Tail Biting Prevalence in Pigs.

Authors:  Grace A Carroll; Jenny M Groarke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Sheep farmers' attitudes towards lameness control: Qualitative exploration of factors affecting adoption of the lameness Five-Point Plan.

Authors:  Caroline M Best; Alison Z Pyatt; Janet Roden; Malgorzata Behnke; Kate Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The etiology of digital dermatitis in ruminants: recent perspectives.

Authors:  Jennifer H Wilson-Welder; David P Alt; Jarlath E Nally
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2015-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.