Literature DB >> 22891361

Lack of response after initial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: does it predict failure of subsequent treatment?

Christos Georgiades1, Jean-François Geschwind, Neil Harrison, Andrew Hines-Peralta, Eleni Liapi, Kelvin Hong, Zhenke Wu, Ihab Kamel, Constantine Frangakis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To (a) evaluate the response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to chemoembolization after initial nonresponse, as determined with European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and (b) compare posttreatment survival of initial nonresponders versus that of initial responders.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, which was compliant with HIPAA. A total of 116 consecutive patients (96 men, 20 women; mean age, 63 years) with unresectable HCC who underwent at least two chemoembolization procedures were included. The chemoembolization mixture consisted of 100 mg of cisplatin, 50 mg of doxorubicin, and 10 mg of mitomycin C mixed 1:1 with iodized oil. Tumor response at magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated after each chemoembolization procedure according to EASL criteria and mRECIST. The survival rate in each subgroup was calculated and correlated with response. The Wilcoxon test was used to test group comparability. Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to generate survival curves and compared by using the log-rank test.
RESULTS: No response to initial chemoembolization was seen in 43% and 50% of patients according to EASL criteria and mRECIST, respectively. After a second chemoembolization procedure, 44% (EASL) and 47% (mRECIST) of initial nonresponders showed a significant response. With EASL criteria, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates (±standard error of the mean) after two chemoembolization procedures were 39%±10, 14%±7, and 0%, respectively, for nonresponders and 68%±10, 50%±11, and 37%±11 for responders (P=.036, P=.006, and P<.005 at 1, 2, and 3 years). With mRECIST, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates after two chemoembolization procedures were 49%±9, 20%±8, and 7%±6 for nonresponders and 67%±9, 44%±10, and 36%±9 for responders (P=.174, P=.046, and P=.011 at 1, 2, and 3 years).
CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent chemoembolization for HCC showed a response (with both EASL criteria and mRECIST) and improved survival after the second chemoembolization treatment. At least two chemoembolization procedures should be performed in the same targeted lesions before further treatment is abandoned. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22891361      PMCID: PMC4137783          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: comprehensive imaging and survival analysis in a 172-patient cohort.

Authors:  Robert J Lewandowski; Mary F Mulcahy; Laura M Kulik; Ahsun Riaz; Robert K Ryu; Talia B Baker; Saad M Ibrahim; Michael I Abecassis; Frank H Miller; Kent T Sato; Seanthan Senthilnathan; Scott A Resnick; Edward Wang; Ramona Gupta; Richard Chen; Steven B Newman; Howard B Chrisman; Albert A Nemcek; Robert L Vogelzang; Reed A Omary; Al B Benson; Riad Salem
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Christos S Georgiades; Kelvin Hong; Michael D'Angelo; Jean-Francois H Geschwind
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Prognostic accuracy of 12 liver staging systems in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Christos S Georgiades; Eleni Liapi; Constantine Frangakis; Ju-un Park; Hyung Woo Kim; Kelvin Hong; Jean-Francois H Geschwind
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chung-Mau Lo; Henry Ngan; Wai-Kuen Tso; Chi-Leung Liu; Chi-Ming Lam; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; Sheung-Tat Fan; John Wong
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riccardo Lencioni; Josep M Llovet
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 6.115

6.  Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Maria Isabel Real; Xavier Montaña; Ramon Planas; Susana Coll; John Aponte; Carmen Ayuso; Margarita Sala; Jordi Muchart; Ricard Solà; Joan Rodés; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with yttrium-90 microspheres.

Authors:  Ana L Keppke; Riad Salem; Denise Reddy; Jie Huang; Jianhua Jin; Andrew C Larson; Frank H Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Calogero Cammà; Filippo Schepis; Ambrogio Orlando; Maddalena Albanese; Lillian Shahied; Franco Trevisani; Pietro Andreone; Antonio Craxì; Mario Cottone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; Jordi Bruix; Barnett S Kramer; Riccardo Lencioni; Andrew X Zhu; Morris Sherman; Myron Schwartz; Michael Lotze; Jayant Talwalkar; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable?

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Carmen Ayuso; María Varela; Jordi Rimola; Amelia J Hessheimer; Carlos Rodriguez de Lope; María Reig; Luís Bianchi; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  P Fitzmorris; M Shoreibah; B S Anand; A K Singal
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Local Arterial Therapies in the Management of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Laura W Goff
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-10-27

3.  Intraprocedural 3D Quantification of Lipiodol Deposition on Cone-Beam CT Predicts Tumor Response After Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhijun Wang; Rongxin Chen; Rafael Duran; Yan Zhao; Gayane Yenokyan; Julius Chapiro; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Alessandro Radaelli; MingDe Lin; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B: commentary on a 103-patient Asian cohort.

Authors:  Laura Kulik; Riad Salem
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 5.  Chemoembolization with DC Bead™ for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Katerina Malagari; Emmanouil Emmanouil; Maria Pomoni; Dimitrios Kelekis
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 6.  Systematic review of catheter-based intra-arterial therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  R Duran; J Chapiro; R E Schernthaner; J-F H Geschwind
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Interventional Oncology in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Progress Through Innovation.

Authors:  Lin Mu; Julius Chapiro; Jeremiah Stringam; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 8.  Locoregional and systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Olumide B Gbolahan; Michael A Schacht; Eric W Beckley; Thomas P LaRoche; Bert H O'Neil; Maximilian Pyko
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-04

9.  Comparison of Existing Response Criteria in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization Using a 3D Quantitative Approach.

Authors:  Vania Tacher; MingDe Lin; Rafael Duran; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Howard Lee; Julius Chapiro; Michael Chao; Zhijun Wang; Constantine Frangakis; Jae Ho Sohn; Mitchell Gil Maltenfort; Timothy Pawlik; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Hong Kong consensus recommendations on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; Tom Tan-To Cheung; Philip Chong-Hei Kwok; Ann-Shing Lee; Tat-Wing Li; Kwok-Loon Loke; Stephen Lam Chan; Moon-Tong Cheung; Tak-Wing Lai; Chin-Cheung Cheung; Foon-Yiu Cheung; Ching-Kong Loo; Yiu-Kuen But; Shing-Jih Hsu; Simon Chun-Ho Yu; Thomas Yau
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.