BACKGROUND: Understanding the information needs and preferred vehicles of information delivery to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will enhance their care. OBJECTIVE: To survey persons with longstanding IBD as to their information needs and preferred vehicles of information delivery. METHODS: The population-based Manitoba IBD Cohort (n=271, mean disease duration 11 years) was surveyed to assess its information needs across 23 issues, both retrospectively at the time of diagnosis and currently. RESULTS: Most participants (64%) were initially diagnosed by a gastroenterologist, or otherwise by a family physician (19%) or surgeon (12%). Recalling time of diagnosis, at least 80% rated as very important information about common symptoms of IBD, possible complications, long-term prognosis, medication side effects, self management of symptoms and when to involve the doctor, yet only 10% to 36% believed they received the right amount of information about these issues. Dietary guidance was also regarded as important by 80% to 89%, yet only 8% to 16% received the correct amount of information. Regarding current needs, a large proportion believed it would be very helpful to have more information about long-term prognosis (66%) and diet considerations (60% to 68%). The following information sources were regarded as very acceptable: medical specialist (81%); brochure (79%); family doctor (64%); and website (64%), with 51% ranking the medical specialist as the first choice. In a comparison of the responses of this cohort to those of a recently diagnosed sample, there was remarkable consistency in the information needs and most desired sources of information. DISCUSSION: In the present population-based cohort with longstanding disease, dietary information was regarded as the least adequately addressed. There was clear openness to receiving information through other routes than just the medical specialist, suggesting that optimizing brochures and websites would be an important adjunct source of information. CONCLUSION: Approximately 10 years after diagnosis, only a small percentage of persons with IBD believed they received the correct amount of information about the issues they regarded as most important to have discussed at diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the information needs and preferred vehicles of information delivery to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) will enhance their care. OBJECTIVE: To survey persons with longstanding IBD as to their information needs and preferred vehicles of information delivery. METHODS: The population-based Manitoba IBD Cohort (n=271, mean disease duration 11 years) was surveyed to assess its information needs across 23 issues, both retrospectively at the time of diagnosis and currently. RESULTS: Most participants (64%) were initially diagnosed by a gastroenterologist, or otherwise by a family physician (19%) or surgeon (12%). Recalling time of diagnosis, at least 80% rated as very important information about common symptoms of IBD, possible complications, long-term prognosis, medication side effects, self management of symptoms and when to involve the doctor, yet only 10% to 36% believed they received the right amount of information about these issues. Dietary guidance was also regarded as important by 80% to 89%, yet only 8% to 16% received the correct amount of information. Regarding current needs, a large proportion believed it would be very helpful to have more information about long-term prognosis (66%) and diet considerations (60% to 68%). The following information sources were regarded as very acceptable: medical specialist (81%); brochure (79%); family doctor (64%); and website (64%), with 51% ranking the medical specialist as the first choice. In a comparison of the responses of this cohort to those of a recently diagnosed sample, there was remarkable consistency in the information needs and most desired sources of information. DISCUSSION: In the present population-based cohort with longstanding disease, dietary information was regarded as the least adequately addressed. There was clear openness to receiving information through other routes than just the medical specialist, suggesting that optimizing brochures and websites would be an important adjunct source of information. CONCLUSION: Approximately 10 years after diagnosis, only a small percentage of persons with IBD believed they received the correct amount of information about the issues they regarded as most important to have discussed at diagnosis.
Authors: David L B Schwappach; Verena Mülders; Dusan Simic; Stefan Wilm; Petra A Thürmann Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Kylie I Bernstein; Stephen Promislow; Rachel Carr; Patricia Rawsthorne; John R Walker; Charles N Bernstein Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: E J Irvine; B Feagan; J Rochon; A Archambault; R N Fedorak; A Groll; D Kinnear; F Saibil; J W McDonald Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Helen M Becker; Daniel Grigat; Subrata Ghosh; Gilaad G Kaplan; Levinus Dieleman; Eytan Wine; Richard N Fedorak; Aida Fernandes; Remo Panaccione; Herman W Barkema Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-03
Authors: Kimberly Robelin; Peter Senada; Hassan Ghoz; Leslie Sim; Jocelyn Lebow; Michael Picco; John Cangemi; Francis A Farraye; Monia Werlang Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) Date: 2021-11
Authors: Laurie N Fishman; Paul D Mitchell; Paul R Lakin; Lisa Masciarelli; Sarah N Flier Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.839