RATIONALE: Behavioral experiments have demonstrated that the sensory modality of presentation modulates drug cue reactivity. OBJECTIVES: The present study on nicotine addiction tested whether neural responses to smoking cues are modulated by the sensory modality of stimulus presentation. METHODS: We measured brain activation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 15 smokers and 15 nonsmokers while they viewed images of smoking paraphernalia and control objects and while they touched the same objects without seeing them. RESULTS: Haptically presented, smoking-related stimuli induced more pronounced neural cue reactivity than visual cues in the left dorsal striatum in smokers compared to nonsmokers. The severity of nicotine dependence correlated positively with the preference for haptically explored smoking cues in the left inferior parietal lobule/somatosensory cortex, right fusiform gyrus/inferior temporal cortex/cerebellum, hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, and supplementary motor area. CONCLUSIONS: These observations are in line with the hypothesized role of the dorsal striatum for the expression of drug habits and the well-established concept of drug-related automatized schemata, since haptic perception is more closely linked to the corresponding object-specific action pattern than visual perception. Moreover, our findings demonstrate that with the growing severity of nicotine dependence, brain regions involved in object perception, memory, self-processing, and motor control exhibit an increasing preference for haptic over visual smoking cues. This difference was not found for control stimuli. Considering the sensory modality of the presented cues could serve to develop more reliable fMRI-specific biomarkers, more ecologically valid experimental designs, and more effective cue-exposure therapies of addiction.
RATIONALE: Behavioral experiments have demonstrated that the sensory modality of presentation modulates drug cue reactivity. OBJECTIVES: The present study on nicotine addiction tested whether neural responses to smoking cues are modulated by the sensory modality of stimulus presentation. METHODS: We measured brain activation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 15 smokers and 15 nonsmokers while they viewed images of smoking paraphernalia and control objects and while they touched the same objects without seeing them. RESULTS: Haptically presented, smoking-related stimuli induced more pronounced neural cue reactivity than visual cues in the left dorsal striatum in smokers compared to nonsmokers. The severity of nicotine dependence correlated positively with the preference for haptically explored smoking cues in the left inferior parietal lobule/somatosensory cortex, right fusiform gyrus/inferior temporal cortex/cerebellum, hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, and supplementary motor area. CONCLUSIONS: These observations are in line with the hypothesized role of the dorsal striatum for the expression of drug habits and the well-established concept of drug-related automatized schemata, since haptic perception is more closely linked to the corresponding object-specific action pattern than visual perception. Moreover, our findings demonstrate that with the growing severity of nicotine dependence, brain regions involved in object perception, memory, self-processing, and motor control exhibit an increasing preference for haptic over visual smoking cues. This difference was not found for control stimuli. Considering the sensory modality of the presented cues could serve to develop more reliable fMRI-specific biomarkers, more ecologically valid experimental designs, and more effective cue-exposure therapies of addiction.
Authors: Frederic Boy; C John Evans; Richard A E Edden; Krish D Singh; Masud Husain; Petroc Sumner Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Rita Z Goldstein; A D Bud Craig; Antoine Bechara; Hugh Garavan; Anna Rose Childress; Martin P Paulus; Nora D Volkow Journal: Trends Cogn Sci Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 20.229
Authors: Petroc Sumner; Parashkev Nachev; Peter Morris; Andrew M Peters; Stephen R Jackson; Christopher Kennard; Masud Husain Journal: Neuron Date: 2007-06-07 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Bernadette M Cortese; Thomas W Uhde; Kathleen T Brady; F Joseph McClernon; Qing X Yang; Heather R Collins; Todd LeMatty; Karen J Hartwell Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Dana B Hancock; Jen-Chyong Wang; Nathan C Gaddis; Joshua L Levy; Nancy L Saccone; Jerry A Stitzel; Alison Goate; Laura J Bierut; Eric O Johnson Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Evonne J Charboneau; Mary S Dietrich; Sohee Park; Aize Cao; Tristan J Watkins; Jennifer U Blackford; Margaret M Benningfield; Peter R Martin; Maciej S Buchowski; Ronald L Cowan Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Ozra Dehkordi; Jed E Rose; Sadegh Asadi; Kebreten F Manaye; Richard M Millis; Annapurni Jayam-Trouth Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.164