Literature DB >> 22890423

Day 3 embryo shape as a morphologic selection parameter in in vitro fertilization.

Sophia C Kamran1, David E Reichman, Stacey A Missmer, Katharine F Correia, Nilay Karaca, Aasia Romano, Catherine Racowsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether embryo shape is a useful morphologic predictor of developmental competence in IVF cycles.
METHODS: Two hundred eighteen day 3 single embryo transfer (SET) cycles and 225 day 3 double embryo transfer (DET) cycles in which only 8-cell non-fragmented embryos with symmetric blastomeres were transferred and in which the developmental fate of each embryo was known were analyzed for IVF outcomes with respect to embryo shape. Embryo shape was quantitatively calculated after digitizing embryo images using MATLAB, where a score of 1.0 represented a perfectly circular embryo.
RESULTS: The SET data did not reveal a significant impact of embryo shape on embryo developmental fate. The DET data revealed a trend toward the best outcomes in cycles where both embryos exhibited "roundness" scores in the highest tertiles (T3) for embryo shape. However only one subgroup (T2/T1-one embryo in the middle shape tertile (T2) and one in the lowest shape tertile (T1)) was associated with significantly lower odds of live-birth as compared to the referent group (T3/T3). When SET and DET data were combined, embryo shape was not found to be a predictor of IVF outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this retrospective analysis, the weak association of day 3 embryo shape with implantation potential suggests that this morphological characteristic is unlikely to be a useful additional marker for embryo selection after cell number, fragmentation, and blastomere symmetry. Further studies are planned to assess applicability of these conclusions to embryos of varying stages and grades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890423      PMCID: PMC3492581          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9842-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  11 in total

1.  Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Catherine M H Combelles; Aida Nureddin; Yuying Pan; Alison Finn; Lyndon Miles; Sarah Gale; Thomas O'Leary; Katharine V Jackson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Inge E Agerholm; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Day 3 embryo selection by metabolomic profiling of culture medium with near-infrared spectroscopy as an adjunct to morphology: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carlijn G Vergouw; Dorit C Kieslinger; E Hanna Kostelijk; Lucy L Botros; Roel Schats; Peter G Hompes; Denny Sakkas; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S Ziebe; K Petersen; S Lindenberg; A G Andersen; A Gabrielsen; A N Andersen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Non-invasive metabolomic profiling of Day 2 and 5 embryo culture medium: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  T Hardarson; A Ahlström; L Rogberg; L Botros; T Hillensjö; G Westlander; D Sakkas; M Wikland
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers.

Authors:  C Giorgetti; P Terriou; P Auquier; E Hans; J L Spach; J Salzmann; R Roulier
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation.

Authors:  L Scott; R Alvero; M Leondires; B Miller
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Effect of time between human chorionic gonadotropin injection and egg retrieval is age dependent.

Authors:  David E Reichman; Stacey A Missmer; Katharine F Berry; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  S Mastenbroek; M Twisk; F van der Veen; S Repping
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  3 in total

1.  Shape in migration: quantitative image analysis of migrating chemoresistant HCT-8 colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Alessia Pasqualato; Vittorio Lei; Alessandra Cucina; Simona Dinicola; Fabrizio D'Anselmi; Sara Proietti; Maria Grazia Masiello; Alessandro Palombo; Mariano Bizzarri
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Developmental capacity and pregnancy rate of tetrahedral- versus non-tetrahedral-shaped 4-cell stage human embryos.

Authors:  G Cauffman; G Verheyen; H Tournaye; H Van de Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Paternal age and assisted reproductive outcomes in ICSI donor oocytes: is there an effect of older fathers?

Authors:  R Beguería; D García; A Obradors; F Poisot; R Vassena; V Vernaeve
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 6.918

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.