Literature DB >> 22890116

Unanticipated difficult airway in obstetric patients: development of a new algorithm for formative assessment in high-fidelity simulation.

Mrinalini Balki1, Mary Ellen Cooke, Susan Dunington, Aliya Salman, Eric Goldszmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to develop a consensus-based algorithm for the management of the unanticipated difficult airway in obstetrics, and to use this algorithm for the assessment of anesthesia residents' performance during high-fidelity simulation.
METHODS: An algorithm for unanticipated difficult airway in obstetrics, outlining the management of six generic clinical situations of "can and cannot ventilate" possibilities in three clinical contexts: elective cesarean section, emergency cesarean section for fetal distress, and emergency cesarean section for maternal distress, was used to create a critical skills checklist. The authors used four of these scenarios for high-fidelity simulation for residents. Their critical and crisis resource management skills were assessed independently by three raters using their checklist and the Ottawa Global rating scale.
RESULTS: Sixteen residents participated. The checklist scores ranged from 64-80% and improved from scenario 1 to 4. Overall Global rating scale scores were marginal and not significantly different between scenarios. The intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.78) represents a good interrater reliability for the checklist. Multiple critical errors were identified, the most common being not calling for help or a difficult airway cart.
CONCLUSIONS: Aside from identifying common critical errors, the authors noted that the residents' performance was poorest in two of our scenarios: "fetal distress and cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" and "maternal distress and cannot intubate, but can ventilate." More teaching emphasis may be warranted to avoid commonly identified critical errors and to improve overall management. Our study also suggests a potential for experiential learning with successive simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890116     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826903bd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking general anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Hiroyiki Sumikura; Hidetomo Niwa; Masaki Sato; Tatsuo Nakamoto; Takashi Asai; Satoshi Hagihira
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel D A Havyer; Majken T Wingo; Nneka I Comfere; Darlene R Nelson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Furman S McDonald; Darcy A Reed
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Is ultrasonic investigation of transverse tracheal air shadow diameter reasonable for evaluation of difficult airway in pregnant women: A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Meltem Turkay Aydogmus; Kerem Erkalp; Sitki Nadir Sinikoglu; Taner A Usta; Gunes O Ulger; Aysin Alagol
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Multimodal In-training Examination in an Emergency Medicine Residency Training Program: A Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Pin Liu; Shou-Yen Chen; Yu-Che Chang; Chip-Jin Ng; Chung-Hsien Chaou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  Interprofessional collaboration milestones: advocating for common assessment criteria in graduate medical education.

Authors:  Majken T Wingo; Rachel D A Havyer; Nneka I Comfere; Darlene R Nelson; Darcy A Reed
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The novel intubating laryngeal tube (iLTS-D) is comparable to the intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) - a prospective randomised manikin study.

Authors:  Thomas Ott; Matthias Fischer; Tobias Limbach; Irene Schmidtmann; Tim Piepho; Ruediger R Noppens
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.