Literature DB >> 22889756

Defining barriers to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, classifying their causes, and proposed performance indicators for rehabilitation patient flow.

Peter W New1, Peter A Cameron, John H Olver, Johannes U Stoelwinder.   

Abstract

There is little research literature on patient flow in rehabilitation. Accepted definitions of barriers to discharge and agreed performance measures are needed to support research and understanding of this topic. The potential of improved patient flow in rehabilitation to assist relieving demand pressures in acute hospitals underscores its importance. This study develops a definition of barriers to discharge from postacute care and classifies their causes using a multiphased iterative consultation and feedback process involving physiatrists, aged-care physicians, and senior nursing and allied health clinicians. Key performance indicators (KPIs) for postacute patient flow are then proposed, the development of which were informed by the available literature and a survey (n=101) of physiatrists, aged-care physicians, and hospital managers with responsibility for patient flow who were questioned about the use of relevant KPIs in this setting. Most (>70%) respondents believed that using KPIs (eg, waiting time from acceptance by postacute care and ready for transfer until admission, percentage of postacute bed days occupied by inpatients with a discharge barrier) to measure aspects of patient flow could improve processes, but few reported collecting this information (45% admission KPIs, 19% discharge KPIs). By using the definition and classification of discharge barriers prospectively to document and address barriers, in conjunction with appropriate KPIs, postacute patient flow and the efficiency of hospital resource utilization can potentially be improved. Our commentary aims to stimulate interest among others to develop a more robust evidence base for improved flow through postacute care.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22889756     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  8 in total

1.  Prospective study of barriers to discharge from a spinal cord injury rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  P W New
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  The influence of clarification and threats on life situation: patients' experiences 1 year after TSCI.

Authors:  Bodil Bjørnshave Noe; Merete Bjerrum; Sanne Angel
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2017-04-06

3.  Time-series analysis of the barriers for admission into a spinal rehabilitation unit.

Authors:  P W New; M Akram
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Evaluation of the internal construct validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Susan Darzins; Christine Imms; Marilyn Di Stefano; Nicholas F Taylor; Julie F Pallant
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Care in Canada: A Survey of Canadian Centers.

Authors:  Vanessa K Noonan; Elaine Chan; Argelio Santos; Lesley Soril; Rachel Lewis; Anoushka Singh; Christiana L Cheng; Colleen O'Connell; Catherine Truchon; Jérôme Paquet; Sean Christie; Karen Ethans; Eve Tsai; Michael H Ford; Brian Drew; A Gary Linassi; Christopher S Bailey; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Responsiveness, construct and criterion validity of the Personal Care-Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART).

Authors:  Susan W Darzins; Christine Imms; Nora Shields; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Using Evidence To Inform Practice and Policy To Enhance the Quality of Care for Persons with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Christiana L Cheng; Elaine Chan; Nancy P Thorogood; Vanessa K Noonan; Henry Ahn; Christopher S Bailey; Anoushka Singh; Marcel F Dvorak
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Using concept mapping to develop a human rights based indicator framework to assess country efforts to strengthen rehabilitation provision and policy: the Rehabilitation System Diagnosis and Dialogue framework (RESYST).

Authors:  Dimitrios Skempes; John Melvin; Per von Groote; Gerold Stucki; Jerome Bickenbach
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.185

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.