CONTEXT: Plyometric training has been successfully used in different sporting contexts. Studies that investigated the effect of plyometric training on muscle morphology are limited, and results are controversial with regard to which muscle fiber type is mainly affected. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the skeletal muscle structural and ultrastructural change induced by an acute bout of plyometric exercise to determine which type of muscle fibers is predominantly damaged. DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eight healthy, untrained individuals (age = 22 ± 1 years, height = 179.2 ± 6.4 cm, weight = 78.9 ± 5.9 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed an acute bout of plyometric exercise (10 sets of 10 squat-jumps with a 1-minute rest between sets). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blood samples were collected 9 days and immediately before and 6 hours and 1, 2, and 3 days after the acute intervention. Muscle samples were collected 9 days before and 3 days after the exercise intervention. Blood samples were analyzed for creatine kinase activity. Muscle biopsies were analyzed for damage using fluorescent and electron transmission microscopy. RESULTS: Creatine kinase activity peaked 1 day after the exercise bout (529.0 ± 317.8 U/L). Immunofluorescence revealed sarcolemmal damage in 155 of 1616 fibers analyzed. Mainly fast-twitch fibers were damaged. Within subgroups, 7.6% of type I fibers, 10.3% of type IIa fibers, and 14.3% of type IIx fibers were damaged as assessed by losses in dystrophin staining. Similar damage was prevalent in IIx and IIa fibers. Electron microscopy revealed clearly distinguishable moderate and severe sarcomere damage, with damage quantifiably predominant in type II muscle fibers of both the glycolytic and oxidative subtypes (86% and 84%, respectively, versus only 27% of slow-twitch fibers). CONCLUSIONS: We provide direct evidence that a single bout of plyometric exercise affected mainly type II muscle fibers.
CONTEXT: Plyometric training has been successfully used in different sporting contexts. Studies that investigated the effect of plyometric training on muscle morphology are limited, and results are controversial with regard to which muscle fiber type is mainly affected. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the skeletal muscle structural and ultrastructural change induced by an acute bout of plyometric exercise to determine which type of muscle fibers is predominantly damaged. DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eight healthy, untrained individuals (age = 22 ± 1 years, height = 179.2 ± 6.4 cm, weight = 78.9 ± 5.9 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed an acute bout of plyometric exercise (10 sets of 10 squat-jumps with a 1-minute rest between sets). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Blood samples were collected 9 days and immediately before and 6 hours and 1, 2, and 3 days after the acute intervention. Muscle samples were collected 9 days before and 3 days after the exercise intervention. Blood samples were analyzed for creatine kinase activity. Muscle biopsies were analyzed for damage using fluorescent and electron transmission microscopy. RESULTS: Creatine kinase activity peaked 1 day after the exercise bout (529.0 ± 317.8 U/L). Immunofluorescence revealed sarcolemmal damage in 155 of 1616 fibers analyzed. Mainly fast-twitch fibers were damaged. Within subgroups, 7.6% of type I fibers, 10.3% of type IIa fibers, and 14.3% of type IIx fibers were damaged as assessed by losses in dystrophin staining. Similar damage was prevalent in IIx and IIa fibers. Electron microscopy revealed clearly distinguishable moderate and severe sarcomere damage, with damage quantifiably predominant in type II muscle fibers of both the glycolytic and oxidative subtypes (86% and 84%, respectively, versus only 27% of slow-twitch fibers). CONCLUSIONS: We provide direct evidence that a single bout of plyometric exercise affected mainly type II muscle fibers.
Authors: Kristian Vissing; Mads Brink; Simon Lønbro; Henrik Sørensen; Kristian Overgaard; Kasper Danborg; Jesper Mortensen; Ole Elstrøm; Nikolaj Rosenhøj; Steffen Ringgaard; Jesper L Andersen; Per Aagaard Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: L L Smith; M H Brunetz; T C Chenier; M R McCammon; J A Houmard; M E Franklin; R G Israel Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Shaun Huygaerts; Francesc Cos; Daniel D Cohen; Julio Calleja-González; Ricard Pruna; Pedro E Alcaraz; Anthony J Blazevich Journal: Sports Med Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Konstantin D Bergmeister; Marion Gröger; Martin Aman; Anna Willensdorfer; Krisztina Manzano-Szalai; Stefan Salminger; Oskar C Aszmann Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: José Afonso; Sílvia Rocha-Rodrigues; Filipe M Clemente; Michele Aquino; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Hugo Sarmento; Alberto Fílter; Jesús Olivares-Jabalera; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 4.566