Literature DB >> 22889605

Atenolol is associated with lower day-of-surgery heart rate compared to long- and short-acting metoprolol.

Robert B Schonberger1, Cynthia Brandt, Jessica Feinleib, Feng Dai, Matthew M Burg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors analyzed the association between outpatient β-blocker type and day-of-surgery (DOS) heart rate in ambulatory surgical patients. They further investigated whether differences in DOS heart rate between atenolol and metoprolol could be explained by once-daily versus twice-daily dosing regimens.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
SETTING: Veterans Administration hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory surgical patients on long-term atenolol or metoprolol.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using a propensity-score-matched cohort, DOS heart rates were compared in patients prescribed atenolol versus metoprolol. Then, once-daily and twice-daily metoprolol formulations were differentiated and DOS heart rates were compared within a general linear model. DOS heart rates in patients prescribed atenolol versus any metoprolol formulation were slower by a mean of 5.1 beats/min (66.6 v 71.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] of difference, 1.9-8.3; p = 0.002), a difference that was not observed in preoperative primary care visits. The general linear model showed that patients prescribed atenolol (typically once-daily dosing) had a mean DOS heart rate 5.6 beats/min lower compared with patients prescribed once-daily metoprolol succinate (68.9 v 74.5; 95% CI of difference, -8.6 to -2.6; p < 0.001) and 3.8 beats/min lower compared with patients prescribed twice-daily metoprolol tartrate (68.9 v 72.7; 95% CI of difference, -6.1 to -1.6; p < 0.001). DOS heart rates were similar between different formulations of metoprolol (95% CI of difference, -1.0 to +4.6; p = 0.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Atenolol is associated with a lower DOS heart rate versus metoprolol. The heart rate difference is specific to the day of surgery and is not explained by once-daily versus twice-daily dosing regimens.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22889605      PMCID: PMC3557658          DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  16 in total

1.  The relationship between preoperative and primary care blood pressure among veterans presenting from home for surgery: is there evidence for anesthesiologist-initiated blood pressure referral?

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Matthew M Burg; Natalie Holt; Carrie L Lukens; Feng Dai; Cynthia Brandt
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Does tight heart rate control improve beta-blocker efficacy? An updated analysis of the noncardiac surgical randomized trials.

Authors:  W Scott Beattie; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Keyvan Karkouti; Stuart McCluskey; Gordon Tait
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Relative prevalence of comorbidities and treatment contraindications in HIV-mono-infected and HIV/HCV-co-infected veterans.

Authors:  Joseph L Goulet; Shawn L Fultz; Kathleen A McGinnis; Amy C Justice
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.177

4.  High-dose beta-blockers and tight heart rate control reduce myocardial ischemia and troponin T release in vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Harm H H Feringa; Jeroen J Bax; Eric Boersma; Miklos D Kertai; Simon H Meij; Wael Galal; Olaf Schouten; Ian R Thomson; Peter Klootwijk; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Jan Klein; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Perioperative β-blockade: atenolol is associated with reduced mortality when compared to metoprolol.

Authors:  Arthur W Wallace; Selwyn Au; Brian A Cason
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  β-blocker withdrawal among patients presenting for surgery from home.

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Carrie L Lukens; O Dicle Turkoglu; Jessica L Feinleib; Kenneth L Haspel; Matthew M Burg
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Lipophilic versus hydrophilic beta(1) blockers and the cardiac sympatho-vagal balance during stress and daily activity in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A Kardos; V Long; J Bryant; J Singh; P Sleight; B Casadei
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Noninvasive detection of risk for emotion-provoked myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Matthew M Burg; Brendon Graeber; Aseem Vashist; Dorothea Collins; Christine Earley; Joyce Liu; Rachel Lampert; Robert Soufer
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Aging and infectious diseases: do patterns of comorbidity vary by HIV status, age, and HIV severity?

Authors:  Joseph L Goulet; Shawn L Fultz; David Rimland; Adeel Butt; Cynthia Gibert; Maria Rodriguez-Barradas; Kendall Bryant; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Anger-induced T-wave alternans predicts future ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  Rachel Lampert; Vladimir Shusterman; Matthew Burg; Craig McPherson; William Batsford; Anna Goldberg; Robert Soufer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  The problem of controlling for imperfectly measured confounders on dissimilar populations: a database simulation study.

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Todd Gilbertsen; Feng Dai
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Balancing Model Performance and Simplicity to Predict Postoperative Primary Care Blood Pressure Elevation.

Authors:  Robert B Schonberger; Feng Dai; Cynthia A Brandt; Matthew M Burg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.