Literature DB >> 22889401

Secondary cancers after intensity-modulated radiotherapy, brachytherapy and radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer: incidence and cause-specific survival outcomes according to the initial treatment intervention.

Michael J Zelefsky1, Xin Pei, Tatiana Teslova, Deborah Kuk, Juan Martin Magsanoc, Marisa Kollmeier, Brett Cox, Zhigang Zhang.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Radiation Therapy for prostate cancer can increase the risk for the development of second cancers after treatment. This study highlights the fact that such second cancers within the pelvis do occur but are not as common as previously reported. In this report we also note that even among patients who develop second cancers, if detected earlier, the majority are alive 5 years after the diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: • To report on the incidence of secondary malignancy (SM) development after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) for prostate cancer and to compare this with a cohort contemporaneously treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: • Between 1998 and 2001, 2658 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with RP (n = 1348), EBRT (n = 897) or BT (n = 413). • Using the RP cohort as a control we compared the incidence of SMs, such as rectal or bladder cancers noted within the pelvis, and the incidence of extrapelvic SMs.
RESULTS: • The 10-year SM-free survival for the RP, BT and EBRT cohorts were 89%, 87%, and 83%, respectively (RP vs EBRT, P = 0.002; RP vs BT, P = 0.37). • The 10-year likelihoods for bladder or colorectal cancer SM development in the RP, BT and EBRT groups were 3%, 2% and 4%, respectively (P = 0.29). • Multivariate analysis of predictors for development of all SMs showed that older age (P = 0.01) and history of smoking (P < 0.001) were significant predictors for the development of a SM, while treatment intervention was not found to be a significant variable. • Among 243 patients who developed a SM, the 5-year likelihood of SM-related mortality among patients with SMs in the EBRT and BT groups was 43.7% and 15.6%, respectively, compared with 26.3% in the RP cohort; P = 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS: • The incidence of SM after radiotherapy was not significantly different from that after RP when adjusted for patient age and smoking history. • The incidence of bladder and rectal cancers was low for both EBRT- and BT-treated patients. • Among patients who developed a SM, the likelihood of mortality related to the SM was not significantly different among the treatment cohorts.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22889401     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  26 in total

1.  Ten-year outcomes of I¹²⁵ low-dose-rate brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience in Japan.

Authors:  Narihiko Hayashi; Koji Izumi; Futoshi Sano; Yasuhide Miyoshi; Hiroji Uemura; Takeo Kasuya; Akiko Mukai; Masayuki Hata; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Dose Escalation for Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Long-Term Update on the Outcomes of a Phase 3, Single Institution Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dario Pasalic; Deborah A Kuban; Pamela K Allen; Chad Tang; Shane M Mesko; Stephen R Grant; Alexander A Augustyn; Steven J Frank; Seungtaek Choi; Karen E Hoffman; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; Sean E McGuire; Alan Pollack; Mitchell S Anscher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Risk of second cancers according to radiation therapy technique and modality in prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Jeannette Wong; Ruth Kleinerman; Clara Kim; Lindsay Morton; Justin E Bekelman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Prostate cancer: challenges in selecting the optimal therapy.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  [Second neoplasms after percutaneous radiotherapy].

Authors:  F Haidl; D Pfister; R Semrau; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Secondary Cancers After Radiation Therapy for Primary Prostate or Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yen-Chien Lee; Chung-Cheng Hsieh; Chung-Yi Li; Jen-Pin Chuang; Jenq-Chang Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Novel radiotherapy techniques for involved-field and involved-node treatment of mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma: when should they be considered and which questions remain open?

Authors:  Frank Lohr; Dietmar Georg; Luca Cozzi; Hans Theodor Eich; Damien C Weber; Julia Koeck; Barbara Knäusl; Karin Dieckmann; Yasser Abo-Madyan; Christian Fiandra; Rolf-Peter Mueller; Andreas Engert; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 8.  Emerging targets for radioprotection and radiosensitization in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sumit Kumar; Rajnish Kumar Singh; Ramovatar Meena
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-19

9.  Risk of secondary rectal cancer and colon cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiguo Zhu; Shankun Zhao; Yangzhou Liu; Jiamin Wang; Lianmin Luo; Ermao Li; Chaofeng Zhang; Jintai Luo; Zhigang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Long-Term Management of Incidental Bladder Cancer Detected in Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Norihito Soga; Jun Furusawa; Yuji Ogura
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.