Literature DB >> 22889295

Comparative effectiveness of water infusion vs air insufflation in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

W U Jun1, H U Bing.   

Abstract

AIM: Colonoscopy with air insufflation is known to result in abdominal pain and discomfort. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of water infusion during colonoscopy through a meta-analysis.
METHOD: Original papers and abstracts published up to October 2011 were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library Database and important meeting abstracts. Clinical appraisal and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Statistical analysis was performed by meta-analysis using a fixed effects model or a random effects model.
RESULTS: Seven studies involving 872 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the water infusion group had fewer patients requiring abdominal compression or position change [risk ratio (RR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.59, 0.91], a lower mean pain score (RR -1.10, 95% CI -1.26, -0.95), lower maximum pain score (RR -2.34, 95% CI -2.92, -1.76) and fewer patients requiring on-demand sedation (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31, 0.66) than the air insufflation group during colonoscopy. There were no significant differences in caecal intubation rate, caecal intubation time, total procedure time and adenoma detection rate.
CONCLUSION: Water infusion significantly decreases patient discomfort and abdominal pain during colonoscopy without affecting operation time and intubation success rate.
© 2012 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2012 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22889295     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of water-immersion colonoscopy.

Authors:  Shinya Sugimoto; Takeshi Mizukami
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Use of warm carbon dioxide insufflators does not affect intra-colonic gas temperature and has no effect on polyp detection rate during colonoscopy - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akash M Patel; Jordan Green; Fahd Jowhari; Lawrence Hookey
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-07-06

3.  Is water exchange superior to water immersion in detecting adenomas during colonoscopies? Results from a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Shi; Dan Tian; Xiaofei Ye; Qiong Wu; Yanglin Pan; Zhiping Yang; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-07-17

4.  Can Water Exchange Improve Patient Tolerance in Unsedated Colonoscopy A Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Richard Azevedo; Cátia Leitão; João Pinto; Helena Ribeiro; Flávio Pereira; Ana Caldeira; António Banhudo
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-16

Review 5.  What Influences the Quality of Prevention Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Wolfgang Schmidt-Tänzer; Axel Eickhoff
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02

6.  Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion for unsedated colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic constipation in China.

Authors:  Xiaoling Xu; Haihang Zhu; Di Chen; Langui Fan; Ting Lu; Qin Shen; Chaowu Chen; Denghao Deng
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.