Literature DB >> 22889084

Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone maintenance around tissue level implant and bone level implant: a randomised controlled trial. A 1-year follow-up.

N Fernández-Formoso1, B Rilo, M J Mora, I Martínez-Silva, A M Díaz-Afonso.   

Abstract

The etiologic factors associated with crestal bone loss have not been comprehensively clarified. Several theories exist as to the reason for the observed changes in crestal bone height following implant restoration. In the 1990s, the wide-diameter implants were commercially introduced. Initially, the implants were restored with standard-diameter abutments because of lack of matching prosthetic components. Long-term radiographic follow-up of these 'platform-switched' restored wide-diameter dental implants has demonstrated a smaller-than-expected vertical change in the crestal bone height around these implants that is typically observed around implants restored conventionally with prosthetic components of matching diameters. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to assess radiographically marginal bone level alterations in implants restored according to the platform-switching concept compared with traditionally restored implants. Fifty-four subjects to participate in this randomised controlled study were selected. Two groups were assigned at random: control group (56 implants were restored with standard matching-diameter abutments) and test group (58 implants were restored with medialised abutments). X-ray explorations were taken for peri-implant bone level at the minute the last cementing of the prosthesis and at 1-year follow-up. NHI Image was used to digitally process and manipulate the radiographic images and perform the measurements. Mean of bone loss with platform-switching implants was -0·01 mm, and the mean of bone loss with standard platform implant was 0·42 mm. Outcomes of this study indicated that the platform-switching design could preserve the crestal bone levels to 1-year follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22889084     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02343.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  9 in total

1.  Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation.

Authors:  David Palombo; Maryam Rahmati; Fabio Vignoletti; Javier Sanz-Esporrin; Håvard Jostein Haugen; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 5.021

2.  Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Russell A Baer; Robert Nölken; Snjezana Colic; Guido Heydecke; Christine Mirzakhanian; Alexandra Behneke; Nikolaus Behneke; Edward Gottesman; Liliana Ottria; Alessandro Pozzi; Alexander Fügl; Werner Zechner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Changes around Dental Implants with Platform-Switched and Platform-Matched Abutments: A Retrospective 5-Year Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  Hsi-Kuei Lin; Jerry Chin-Yi Lin; Yu-Hwa Pan; Eisner Salamanca; Yi-Ting Chang; Yung-Szu Hsu; Yi-Fan Wu; Chin-Kai Lin; Odontuya Dorj; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-27

4.  A meta analysis for evaluation of marginal bone level changes at dental implants.

Authors:  Varun Kumar; Geeta Arya; Pranshu Singh; Pallavi Chauhan
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 5.  Bone loss-related factors in tissue and bone level dental implants: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Hamed Mortazavi; Amin Khodadoustan; Aida Kheiri; Lida Kheiri
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 6.  Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frank Peter Strietzel; Konrad Neumann; Moritz Hertel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Platform switch versus platform match in the posterior mandible – 1-year results of a multicentre randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Fernando Guerra; Wilfried Wagner; Jörg Wiltfang; Salomão Rocha; Maximilian Moergel; Eleonore Behrens; Pedro Nicolau
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with severe horizontal bone deficit on mini-implants with two-piece design-retrospective analysis after a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Lukas Wimmer; Pantelis Petrakakis; Karim El-Mahdy; Surian Herrmann; Dirk Nolte
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-28

Review 9.  Comparative Study by Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Peri-Implant Effect of Two Types of Platforms: Platform-Switching versus Conventional Platforms.

Authors:  Alejo Juan-Montesinos; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Maria Fernanda Solá-Ruiz; Rocío Marco-Pitarch; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carla Fons-Badal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.