Geoffrey Y Ku1, David H Ilson. 1. Gastrointestinal Oncology Service Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric (EG) adenocarcinomas are aggressive malignancies. Although uncommon in the United States, gastric cancer is endemic in East Asia. In this review we focus on perioperative strategies for locally advanced EG adenocarcinomas. DESIGN: We summarized the results of completed phase III trials of perioperative therapy for locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, gastroesophageal (GE) junction, or stomach. We also reviewed ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS: In the adjuvant setting following surgery, validated approaches include chemoradiation with a fluoropyrimidine or chemotherapy (using a fluoropyrimidine with or without platinum compound). In the neoadjuvant setting, some trials have shown a benefit for perioperative chemotherapy. Trials in esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas have also shown improved outcomes with preoperative chemoradiation, which, on the basis of a phase III trial and large meta-analysis, may be superior to preoperative chemotherapy. Changes on positron emission tomography (PET) scans following chemotherapy or chemoradiation have been shown to be prognostic, and the use of PET imaging to guide the choice of chemotherapy with concurrent radiation is being evaluated. Other trials are combining targeted therapies with standard treatments. CONCLUSION: Numerous adjuvant and pre-/perioperative strategies have now been shown to improve survival by approximately 15% compared to surgery alone. Ongoing trials will hopefully clarify the relative superiority of such approaches, the ability of PET to direct therapy, and the role of targeted agents in treating locally advanced tumors.
BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric (EG) adenocarcinomas are aggressive malignancies. Although uncommon in the United States, gastric cancer is endemic in East Asia. In this review we focus on perioperative strategies for locally advanced EG adenocarcinomas. DESIGN: We summarized the results of completed phase III trials of perioperative therapy for locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagus, gastroesophageal (GE) junction, or stomach. We also reviewed ongoing clinical trials. RESULTS: In the adjuvant setting following surgery, validated approaches include chemoradiation with a fluoropyrimidine or chemotherapy (using a fluoropyrimidine with or without platinum compound). In the neoadjuvant setting, some trials have shown a benefit for perioperative chemotherapy. Trials in esophageal and GE junction adenocarcinomas have also shown improved outcomes with preoperative chemoradiation, which, on the basis of a phase III trial and large meta-analysis, may be superior to preoperative chemotherapy. Changes on positron emission tomography (PET) scans following chemotherapy or chemoradiation have been shown to be prognostic, and the use of PET imaging to guide the choice of chemotherapy with concurrent radiation is being evaluated. Other trials are combining targeted therapies with standard treatments. CONCLUSION: Numerous adjuvant and pre-/perioperative strategies have now been shown to improve survival by approximately 15% compared to surgery alone. Ongoing trials will hopefully clarify the relative superiority of such approaches, the ability of PET to direct therapy, and the role of targeted agents in treating locally advanced tumors.
Authors: D P Kelsen; R Ginsberg; T F Pajak; D G Sheahan; L Gunderson; J Mortimer; N Estes; D G Haller; J Ajani; W Kocha; B D Minsky; J A Roth Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-12-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J F Bosset; M Gignoux; J P Triboulet; E Tiret; G Mantion; D Elias; P Lozach; J C Ollier; J J Pavy; M Mercier; T Sahmoud Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde; Ken Herrmann; Tibor Schuster; Hans Geinitz; Rupert Langer; Karin Becker; Katja Ott; Matthias Ebert; Frank Zimmermann; Helmut Friess; Markus Schwaiger; Christian Peschel; Florian Lordick; Bernd Joachim Krause Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J S Macdonald; S R Smalley; J Benedetti; S A Hundahl; N C Estes; G N Stemmermann; D G Haller; J A Ajani; L L Gunderson; J M Jessup; J A Martenson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-09-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mira Sudam Wagh; Arun Peter Mathew; Bharat Veerabhadran; Madhu Muralee; Sajeed Abdul Rahuman; Preethi Sarah George; K Chandramohan Journal: Indian J Palliat Care Date: 2020-08-29
Authors: Daniel Buergy; Frank Lohr; Tobias Baack; Kerstin Siebenlist; Stefan Haneder; Henrik Michaely; Frederik Wenz; Judit Boda-Heggemann Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 3.481