| Literature DB >> 22888303 |
Luciene C C Sousa1, Célia M F Gontijo, Helbert A Botelho, Cleusa G Fonseca.
Abstract
Didelphis albiventris is a well-known and common marsupial. Due to its high adaptability, this very widespread generalist species occurs under various environmental conditions, this even including protected regions and disturbed urban areas. We studied a 653 bp fragment of cytochrome oxidase c (COI) from 93 biological samples from seven Brazilian localities, with linear distances ranging between 58 and about 1800 km to analyze the effects of geographic distances on variability and genetic differentiation. The haplotype network presented nine haplotypes and two genetic clusters compatible with the two most distant geographic areas of the states of Minas Gerais, in the southeast, and Rio Grande do Sul, in the extreme south. As each cluster was characterized by low nucleotide and high haplotype diversities, their populations were obviously composed of closely related haplotypes. Surprisingly, moderate to high F(ST) differentiation values and a very weak phylogeographic signal characterizes interpopulation comparisons within Minas Gerais interdemes, these being correlated with the presence of privative haplotypes. On a large rgeographic scale, a comparison between demes from Minas Gerais and Rio Grande do Sul presented high F(ST) values and a robust phylogeographic pattern. This unexpected scenario implies that mtDNA gene flow was insufficient to maintain population cohesion, reflected by the observed high differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: COI; Didelphis albiventris; genetic differentiation; marsupial; variability
Year: 2012 PMID: 22888303 PMCID: PMC3389542 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572012005000035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Matrix with linear geographic distances (km) between sampling areas. The meanings of abbreviations are cited in the topic ‘sampling’ in “Material and Methods”.
| Demes | BH | Div | RIX | Bam | Pir | Alm | RS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH | |||||||
| Div | 111 | ||||||
| RIX | 548 | 590 | |||||
| Bam | 221 | 115 | 600 | ||||
| Pir | 94 | 58 | 621 | 164 | |||
| Alm | 523 | 622 | 393 | 700 | 620 | ||
| RS | 1256 | 1180 | 1725 | 1130 | 1170 | 1795 |
Figure 1Minas Gerais, a southeastern state (Drummond ), and Rio Grande do Sul, the southernmost state of Brazil (SCP/DEPLAN, 2007), with approximate collection locations, sample numbers (in parentheses) and biome correspondence. Three samples from road killed animals from RS, but without exact information on locality, were not represented.
Haplotype (Hap) occurrence in populations. The meanings of abbreviations are cited in the topic ‘sampling’ in “Material and Methods”.
| Locality | Hap1 | Hap2 | Hap3 | Hap4 | Hap5 | Hap6 | Hap7 | Hap8 | Hap9 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH | 22 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| Divinópolis | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| RIX | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| Bambuí | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Piracema | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Almenara | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| RS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| Total | 46 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 93 |
Intrapopulation and total diversities. Number of samples (N), number of haplotypes (H), number of polymorphic sites (S), nucleotide diversity (π), haplotype diversity (Hd). The meanings of locality abbreviations are cited in the topic ‘sampling’ in “Material and Methods”.
| Locality | N | H | S | % π | % Hd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH | 40 | 3 | 3 | 0.17 | 59.10 |
| Divinópolis | 18 | 3 | 3 | 0.11 | 46.41 |
| RIX | 18 | 3 | 4 | 0.3 | 69.94 |
| Bambuí | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.20 | 66.67 |
| Piracema | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.20 | 66.67 |
| Almenara | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RS | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0.09 | 55.56 |
| Total | 93 | 9 | 24 | 0.65 | 72.35 |
Figure 2Haplotype network for D. albiventris using statistical parsimony. Numbered circles represent haplotypes (Hap.), with the circle size corresponding to haplotype frequency. Colors represent the sampling sites. Small open circles indicate missing haplotypes.
Population pairwise FST calculated using the Tamura & Nei distance method. The meanings of abbreviations are cited in “Material and Methods”.
| Comparison | FST | p values |
|---|---|---|
| BH x RIX | 0.2774 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 |
| BH x Div | 0.1935 | 0.0029 ± 0.0016 |
| RIX x Div | 0.2790 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 |
| BH x RS | 0.9431 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 |
| Div x RS | 0.9622 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 |
| RIX x RS | 0.9127 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 |
AMOVA using the Tamura & Nei distance method, considering MG and RS as groups, and collection localities as populations.
| Source of variation | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|
| Among groups | 91.30 |
| Among populations within groups | 2.26 |
| Within populations | 6.44 |
FST = 0.9356; p = 0.00 ± 0.00.
AMOVA using the Tamura & Nei distance method, considering BH, Div and RIX as populations. The meanings of abbreviations’ are cited in “Material and Methods”.
| Source of variation | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|
| Among groups | 17.04 |
| Among populations within groups | 13.21 |
| Within populations | 69.74 |
Figure 3Mismatch distribution analysis showing bimodal distribution (non-significant).
Figure 4Mantel Test Results showing correlations between genetic and geographical distances.