| Literature DB >> 22888294 |
Abstract
We surveyed the substitution patterns in the ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase (KAO) gene in 11 species of Oryzeae with an outgroup in the Ehrhartoidaea. The synonymous and non-synonymous substitution rates showed a high positive correlation with each other, but were negatively correlated with codon usage bias and GC content at third codon positions. The substitution rate was heterogenous among lineages. Likelihood-ratio tests showed that the non-synonymous/synonymous rate ratio changed significantly among lineages. Site-specific models provided no evidence for positive selection of particular amino acid sites in any codon of the KAO gene. This finding suggested that the significant rate heterogeneity among some lineages may have been caused by variability in the relaxation of the selective constraint among lineages or by neutral processes.Entities:
Keywords: codon usage bias; ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase (KAO); positive selection; rate heterogeneity; substitution rate
Year: 2012 PMID: 22888294 PMCID: PMC3389533 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572012005000020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Species used in this study.
| Species | Genome | Accession | Country |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | GenBank | ||
| A | 105282 | Australia | |
| B | 103903 | Tanzania | |
| C | 104972 | China | |
| E | 105263 | Australia-PNAS | |
| F | 105151 | Sierra Leone-PNAS | |
| G | M8-15 | Ledong, Hainan | |
| — | 105610 | Cameroon | |
| — | 106186 | Japan | |
| — | 100913 | Argentina | |
| — | 82043 | Argentina | |
| — | 218290 | South Africa |
All accessions were obtained from the International Rice Research Institute at Los Banos, Philippines.
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the KAO gene and the regions sequenced in this study. Boxes and lines indicate exons and introns, respectively. Exon numbers are labeled with the roman numbers. Locations of primers are shown above the diagram.
Information for the KAO gene sampled in this study.
| Species | Length sequenced (bp) | Coding | Noncoding | Accession number | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Total | Coding | ENC | CBI | GC | GC1,2 | GC3 | GC | ||
| 2231 | 1053 | 35.02 | 0.693 | 0.600 | 0.492 | 0.818 | 0.307 | AP004572 | |
| 1819 | 1053 | 35.60 | 0.678 | 0.598 | 0.492 | 0.818 | 0.334 | EU179429 | |
| 1833 | 1053 | 35.13 | 0.685 | 0.597 | 0.486 | 0.820 | 0.333 | EF577665 | |
| 1844 | 1053 | 39.10 | 0.641 | 0.600 | 0.493 | 0.815 | 0.328 | EF577666 | |
| 1867 | 1053 | 39.27 | 0.637 | 0.602 | 0.495 | 0.818 | 0.334 | EF577667 | |
| 2626 | 1053 | 39.20 | 0.642 | 0.606 | 0.498 | 0.823 | 0.334 | EF577668 | |
| 1808 | 1053 | 37.72 | 0.662 | 0.612 | 0.501 | 0.832 | 0.336 | EF577669 | |
| 1775 | 1053 | 48.56 | 0.405 | 0.565 | 0.489 | 0.718 | 0.327 | EF577670 | |
| 1826 | 1050 | 38.67 | 0.636 | 0.612 | 0.503 | 0.831 | 0.336 | EU179408 | |
| 1772 | 1047 | 42.48 | 0.568 | 0.598 | 0.490 | 0.814 | 0.338 | EU179409 | |
| 1790 | 1047 | 42.02 | 0.569 | 0.595 | 0.490 | 0.805 | 0.328 | EU179410 | |
| 2363 | 1026 | 53.65 | 0.390 | 0.541 | 0.451 | 0.723 | 0.324 | EU179411 | |
| Mean ± SEe | 1962.83 ± 81.51 | 1049.50 ± 2.24 | 40.54 ± 1.61 | 0.601 ± 0.030 | 0.594 ± 0.006 | 0.490 ± 0.004 | 0.803 ± 0.011 | 0.330 ± 0.002 | |
ENC – effective number of codons (Wright, 1990), CBI – codon bias index, GC1, 2 is G+C content at the first and second codon positions.
Sequences downloaded from GenBank.
Average for 11 species of Oryzeae.
Figure 2The relationships between effective number of codons (ENC) and codon bias index (CBI) (A), synonymous substitution rates (dS) (B), and non-synonymous substitution rates (dN) (C), between dS and dN (D) and third codon positions (GC3) (E), and between the first and second codon positions (GC1, 2) and GC3 (F).
Log likelihood values, ω ratios and parameter estimates for the KAO gene in models with variable ω ratios among codon sites.
| Model | ln | Parameter estimates | Models compared | 2ΔL | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mf | 31 | −4103.38 | ω = 0.0001 ∼ 999.000, tree length | M0–Mf | 42.12 | < 0.001 |
| M0 | 23 | −4124.44 | ω = 0.079, tree length = 2.181, kappa (ts/tv) = 1.082 | |||
| M1a | 24 | −4067.60 | ω0 = 0.049, p0 = 0.921; ω1 = 1.000, p1 = 0.079 | M1a–M2a | 0 | 1 |
| M2a | 26 | −4067.60 | p0 = 0.921, p1 = 0.053, p2 = 0.026, ω2 = 1.000 | |||
| M7 | 24 | −4061.19 | p = 0.282, q = 2.548 | M7–M8 | 0 | 1 |
| M8 | 26 | −4061.19 | p0 = 1.000, p = 0.282, q = 2.548; p1 = 0.000, ω = 8.931 |
p – number of parameters, ln – log-likelihood values of the data in each model.
Parameter estimates in different models.
Tree length is the sum of branch lengths.
Results of 110 relative-rate tests for dS (lower triangle) and dN (upper triangle). Rejection of rate equality is indicated by * at the 0.05 level, ** at the 0.01 level, or *** at the 0.001 level. Ehrharta erecta was used as the outgroup in all comparisons. Species names that were inferred to have evolved more quickly in each pairwise comparison are indicated in the table by the first letter of the genus name and the first three letters of the species name.
| Osat | Omer | Opun | Ooff | Oaus | Obra | Ogra | Ltis | Llei | Caqu | Rsub | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osat | - | ***Osat | **Osat | ||||||||
| Omer | - | *Omer | *Ogra | ***Omer | ***Omer | ||||||
| Opun | - | *Opun | ***Opun | **Opun | |||||||
| Ooff | - | **Ooff | **Ooff | ||||||||
| Oaus | - | **Oaus | *Oaus | ||||||||
| Obra | - | *Obra | |||||||||
| Ogra | - | *Ogra | |||||||||
| Ltis | - | **Ltis | *Ltis | ||||||||
| Llei | - | ||||||||||
| Caqu | ***Osat | ***Omer | ***Opun | **Ooff | **Oaus | **Obra | ***Ogra | ***Ltis | **Llei | - | * Rsub |
| Rsub | *Ogra | *Rsub | - |
Caqu – Chikusichloa aquatica, Llei – Luziola leiocarpa, Ltis – Leersia tisserantti, Oaus – O. australiensis, Obra – O. brachyantha, Ogra – O. granulata, Omer – O. meridionalis, Ooff – O. officinalis, Opun – O. punctata, Osat – O. sativa and Rsub – Rhynchoryza subulata.