Literature DB >> 22888151

Neuroenhancers, addiction and research ethics.

David Martin Shaw1.   

Abstract

In their recent paper in this journal, Heinz and colleagues accuse proponents of cognitive enhancement of making two unjustified assumptions. The first of these is the assumption that neuroenhancing drugs will be safe; the second is that research into cognitive enhancement does not pose particular ethical problems. Heinz and colleagues argue that both these assumptions are false. Here, I argue that these assumptions are in fact correct, and that Heinz and colleagues themselves make several assumptions that undermine their argument. Neuroenhancement does raise several ethical concerns, but safety and research in this area pose no unique difficulties.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22888151     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

1.  Quantitative Determination of Vinpocetine in Dietary Supplements.

Authors:  John M T French; Matthew D King; Owen M McDougal
Journal:  Nat Prod Commun       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.986

2.  Reflections on Addiction in Students Using Stimulants for Neuroenhancement: A Preliminary Interview Study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hildt; Klaus Lieb; Christiana Bagusat; Andreas G Franke
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Pharmacological Neuroenhancement: teachers' knowledge and attitudes-Results from a survey study among teachers in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas G Franke; Sophie Lehmberg; Michael Soyka
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2016-09-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.