Literature DB >> 22887822

Are male and female responses to social phobia diagnostic criteria comparable?

Erica Crome1, Andrew Baillie, Alan Taylor.   

Abstract

Females typically report higher social phobia levels than males in community samples, and this may be due to sex bias in assessment measures. This study aims to establish whether patterns of responding to social phobia diagnostic criteria in the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) are comparable across males and females. A subsample of participants in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing (1997) reporting at least one social fear were selected (n = 1755). Analyses were conducted using a series of multi-group confirmatory factor analyses for categorical data, with unique steps to model invariance of residual variances. Partial, but not full, invariance was established, as males and females differed in their responses to items assessing physical anxiety symptoms at low levels of social fear. Whilst these differences were statistically significant, they are likely not to affect clinical practice or rates of social phobia diagnosis. This supports differences on this measure being interpreted as genuine, and strengthens findings females are more vulnerable to social phobia than males.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22887822      PMCID: PMC6878434          DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 1049-8931            Impact factor:   4.035


  29 in total

1.  The development and implementation of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, the National Survey of American Life, and the National Latino and Asian American Survey.

Authors:  Beth-Ellen Pennell; Ashley Bowers; Deborah Carr; Stephanie Chardoul; Gina-Qian Cheung; Karl Dinkelmann; Nancy Gebler; Sue Ellen Hansen; Steve Pennell; Myriam Torres
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 2.  The etiology of social phobia: empirical evidence and an initial model.

Authors:  Ronald M Rapee; Susan H Spence
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-11

3.  Barriers in diagnosing and treating men with depression: a focus group report.

Authors:  Aaron B Rochlen; Debora A Paterniti; Ronald M Epstein; Paul Duberstein; Lindsay Willeford; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2009-05-11

4.  Prevalence, comorbidity, disability and service utilisation. Overview of the Australian National Mental Health Survey.

Authors:  G Andrews; S Henderson; W Hall
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.319

5.  The Composite International Diagnostic Interview. An epidemiologic Instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures.

Authors:  L N Robins; J Wing; H U Wittchen; J E Helzer; T F Babor; J Burke; A Farmer; A Jablenski; R Pickens; D A Regier
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-12

6.  Does gender contribute to heterogeneity in criteria for cannabis abuse and dependence? Results from the national epidemiological survey on alcohol and related conditions.

Authors:  Arpana Agrawal; Michael T Lynskey
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening in Ontario, Canada--a replication study.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Ronald Myers; M L Del Giudice; Larry Pazsat; Peter T Campbell; R I Howlett; Verna Mai; Terry Sullivan; Jasmin Tiro; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Gender differences in the endorsement of symptoms for depression and anxiety: are gender-biased items responsible?

Authors:  Liana S Leach; Helen Christensen; Andrew J Mackinnon
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.254

9.  Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: implications for the cognitive and tripartite models.

Authors:  D A Clark; R A Steer; A T Beck
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-11

10.  Gender effect on clinical features and drug treatment response in social anxiety disorder (social phobia).

Authors:  Gabriela Bezerra De Menezes; Leonardo F Fontenelle; Márcio Versiani
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.812

View more
  1 in total

1.  DSM-IV and DSM-5 social anxiety disorder in the Australian community.

Authors:  Erica Crome; Rachel Grove; Andrew J Baillie; Matthew Sunderland; Maree Teesson; Tim Slade
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.744

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.