Literature DB >> 22887694

Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: a review.

S C Hillman1, D J McMullan, D Williams, E R Maher, M D Kilby.   

Abstract

G-band chromosomal karyotyping of fetal cells obtained by invasive prenatal testing has been used since the 1960s to identify structural chromosomal anomalies. Prenatal testing is usually performed in response to parental request, increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormality associated with advanced maternal age, a high-risk screening test and/or the presence of a congenital malformation identified by ultrasonography. The results of karyotyping may inform the long-term prognosis (e.g. aneuploidy being associated with a poor outcome or microscopic chromosomal anomalies predicting global neurodevelopmental morbidity). Relatively recent advances in microarray technology are now enabling high-resolution genome-wide evaluation for DNA copy number abnormalities (e.g. deletions or duplications). While such technological advances promise increased sensitivity and specificity they can also pose difficult challenges of interpretation and clinical management. This review aims to give interested clinicians without an extensive prior knowledge of microarray technology, an overview of its use in prenatal diagnosis, the literature to date, advantages, potential pitfalls and experience from our own tertiary center.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22887694     DOI: 10.1002/uog.11180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses Detected with Isolated Cardiovascular Malformation: A Multicenter Study, Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Daniele Guadagnolo; Maria Grazia Giuffrida; Barbara Torres; Laura Bernardini; Flavia Ventriglia; Gerardo Piacentini; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Development and validation of a novel 26-plex system for prenatal diagnosis with forensic markers.

Authors:  Mingkun Xie; Jienan Li; Huan Hu; Panpan Wang; Xueqi Cong; Jingzhi Li; Lei Dai; Yang Lu; Weishe Zhang
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  DepthTools: an R package for a robust analysis of gene expression data.

Authors:  Aurora Torrente; Sara López-Pintado; Juan Romo
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Subtelomeric multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification as a supplement for rapid prenatal detection of fetal chromosomal aberrations.

Authors:  Xiangnan Chen; Huanzheng Li; Yijian Mao; Xueqin Xu; Jiaojiao Lv; Lili Zhou; Xiaoling Lin; Shaohua Tang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Karyotyping and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Women Requesting Amniocentesis for Isolated Sonographic Soft Markers or Advanced Maternal Age.

Authors:  Panagiota Tzela; Nikolaos Antonakopoulos; Panagiotis Anastasopoulos; Kleanthi Gourounti
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2021-12

6.  How to Manage Low Estriol Levels in Pregnancies, One Center Experience.

Authors:  Elif Yilmaz Gulec; Alper Gezdirici; Akif Ayaz; Fatma Nihal Ozturk; Ibrahim Polat
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2022-03-18

Review 7.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.