Literature DB >> 22887352

Feasibility and utility of pre-procedure ultrasound imaging of the arm to facilitate transradial coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures (PRIMAFACIE-TRI).

Sanjay Kumar Chugh1, Sunita Chugh, Yashasvi Chugh, Sunil V Rao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility and utility of imaging of both arms using ultrasound to facilitate transradial (TR) and transulnar (TU) coronary angiograms (CA) and intervention.
BACKGROUND: Despite well recognized advantages, transradial approach (TRA) has challenges that reduce procedural success including small arterial size, anatomical variations, and anomalies of radial artery (RA). The utility of routine pre-procedural ultrasound of the arm arteries (PPUAA) in facilitating TRA has not been previously studied.
METHODS: To determine the role of PPUAA, we performed a single center registry of consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional procedures between 2006 and 2011. All patients underwent PPUAA of the right and left radial, ulnar (UA), as well as the brachial arteries (BA) in the antecubital fossa using a linear probe. End-points assessed included the incidence and correlates of arterial sizes, vascular anomalies, procedure success, and fluoroscopy as well as ultrasound assessment times. RA occlusion rates were studied in the last 10 months of the study period.
RESULTS: Complete data on radial (mean 1.9 mm (male);1.7 mm (female)) and ulnar artery size (mean 1.8 mm (male); 1.6 mm (female)) and data on brachial branching anatomy were available in 2,344 patients; 1,872 of whom underwent a TR or TU procedure. The mean time to perform bilateral PPUAA was 6.4 min ± 1.8 min. The incidence of arterial abnormalities was 9.8% in PPUAA. Procedure success was 98.7% for CA and 97.5% for percutaneous coronary intervention. Outcomes were better in this cohort compared with remaining 3,781 patients in whom PPUAA data were not available.
CONCLUSION: This single center prospective registry shows that PPUAA is feasible, requires minimum time, and provides anatomical information that may improve procedure success while reducing patient discomfort, arterial spasm, and fluoroscopy time. These findings should be confirmed in a randomized trial.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22887352     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  10 in total

Review 1.  Radial artery occlusion after transradial approach to cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  John F Wagener; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  How to tackle complications in radial procedures: Tip and tricks.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Chugh; Yashasvi Chugh; Sunita Chugh
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-06-16

Review 3.  Ulnar Artery Catheterization: Is This Our Second Access Site or Is It Still Femoral?

Authors:  Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  George Hahalis; Konstantinos Aznaouridis; Gregory Tsigkas; Periklis Davlouros; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Nikolaos Koutsogiannis; Ioanna Koniari; Marianna Leopoulou; Olivier Costerousse; Dimitris Tousoulis; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 5.  Arterial access and arteriotomy site closure devices.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Frequency and Predictors of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Ussama Munir; Rozi Khan; Nouman Nazeer; Junaid Akhter; Anwaar Ul Hassan; Bashir Hanif
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-30

7.  Safety and feasibility of 5 French Glidesheath Slender for complex transradial interventions in small diameter radial arteries.

Authors:  Yashasvi Chugh; Sunita Chugh; Takashi Matsukage; Sanjay Kumar Chugh
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-01-25

8.  Impact of the Use of a Larger Forearm Artery on the Efficacy and Safety of Transradial and Transulnar Access: A Randomized Trial with Preprocedural Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Pawel Lewandowski; Anna Zuk; Tomasz Slomski; Pawel Maciejewski; Bogumil Ramotowski; Andrzej Budaj
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Comparison of distal radial access versus standard transradial access in patients with smaller diameter radial Arteries(The distal radial versus transradial access in small transradial ArteriesStudy: D.A.T.A - S.T.A.R study).

Authors:  Yashasvi Chugh; Naga Sasidhar Kanaparthy; Shobhit Piplani; Sunita Chugh; Adhir Shroff; Mladen Vidovich; James Nolan; Mamas Mamas; Sanjay Kumar Chugh
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-11-11

Review 10.  Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Rashid; Chun Shing Kwok; Samir Pancholy; Sanjay Chugh; Sasko A Kedev; Ivo Bernat; Karim Ratib; Adrian Large; Doug Fraser; James Nolan; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.