Literature DB >> 22887079

Clinical significance of genetic aberrations in secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Jelena D Milosevic1, Ana Puda, Luca Malcovati, Tiina Berg, Michael Hofbauer, Alexey Stukalov, Thorsten Klampfl, Ashot S Harutyunyan, Heinz Gisslinger, Bettina Gisslinger, Tatiana Burjanivova, Elisa Rumi, Daniela Pietra, Chiara Elena, Alessandro M Vannucchi, Michael Doubek, Dana Dvorakova, Blanka Robesova, Rotraud Wieser, Elisabeth Koller, Nada Suvajdzic, Dragica Tomin, Natasa Tosic, Jacques Colinge, Zdenek Racil, Michael Steurer, Sonja Pavlovic, Mario Cazzola, Robert Kralovics.   

Abstract

The study aimed to identify genetic lesions associated with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) in comparison with AML arising de novo (dnAML) and assess their impact on patients' overall survival (OS). High-resolution genotyping and loss of heterozygosity mapping was performed on DNA samples from 86 sAML and 117 dnAML patients, using Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP 6.0 arrays. Genes TP53, RUNX1, CBL, IDH1/2, NRAS, NPM1, and FLT3 were analyzed for mutations in all patients. We identified 36 recurrent cytogenetic aberrations (more than five events). Mutations in TP53, 9pUPD, and del7q (targeting CUX1 locus) were significantly associated with sAML, while NPM1 and FLT3 mutations associated with dnAML. Patients with sAML carrying TP53 mutations demonstrated lower 1-year OS rate than those with wild-type TP53 (14.3% ± 9.4% vs. 35.4% ± 7.2%; P = 0.002), while complex karyotype, del7q (CUX1) and del7p (IKZF1) showed no significant effect on OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that mutant TP53 was the only independent adverse prognostic factor for OS in sAML (hazard ratio 2.67; 95% CI: 1.33-5.37; P = 0.006). Patients with dnAML and complex karyotype carried sAML-associated defects (TP53 defects in 54.5%, deletions targeting FOXP1 and ETV6 loci in 45.4% of the cases). We identified several co-occurring lesions associated with either sAML or dnAML diagnosis. Our data suggest that distinct genetic lesions drive leukemogenesis in sAML. High karyotype complexity of sAML patients does not influence OS. Somatic mutations in TP53 are the only independent adverse prognostic factor in sAML. Patients with dnAML and complex karyotype show genetic features associated with sAML and myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22887079     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  28 in total

1.  Mutational landscape of the transcriptome offers putative targets for immunotherapy of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Fiorella Schischlik; Roland Jäger; Felix Rosebrock; Eva Hug; Michael Schuster; Raimund Holly; Elisabeth Fuchs; Jelena D Milosevic Feenstra; Edith Bogner; Bettina Gisslinger; Martin Schalling; Elisa Rumi; Daniela Pietra; Gottfried Fischer; Ingrid Faé; Loan Vulliard; Jörg Menche; Torsten Haferlach; Manja Meggendorfer; Anna Stengel; Christoph Bock; Mario Cazzola; Heinz Gisslinger; Robert Kralovics
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Recurrent deletions of IKZF1 in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jasmijn D E de Rooij; Eva Beuling; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Askar Obulkasim; André Baruchel; Jan Trka; Dirk Reinhardt; Edwin Sonneveld; Brenda E S Gibson; Rob Pieters; Martin Zimmermann; C Michel Zwaan; Maarten Fornerod
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Number of RUNX1 mutations, wild-type allele loss and additional mutations impact on prognosis in adult RUNX1-mutated AML.

Authors:  A Stengel; W Kern; M Meggendorfer; N Nadarajah; K Perglerovà; T Haferlach; C Haferlach
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  JARID2 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Myeloid Neoplasms by Repressing Self-Renewal in Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells.

Authors:  Hamza Celik; Won Kyun Koh; Ashley C Kramer; Elizabeth L Ostrander; Cates Mallaney; Daniel A C Fisher; Jingyu Xiang; William C Wilson; Andrew Martens; Alok Kothari; Gregory Fishberger; Eric Tycksen; Darja Karpova; Eric J Duncavage; Youngsook Lee; Stephen T Oh; Grant A Challen
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Whole-exome sequencing identifies novel MPL and JAK2 mutations in triple-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Jelena D Milosevic Feenstra; Harini Nivarthi; Heinz Gisslinger; Emilie Leroy; Elisa Rumi; Ilyas Chachoua; Klaudia Bagienski; Blanka Kubesova; Daniela Pietra; Bettina Gisslinger; Chiara Milanesi; Roland Jäger; Doris Chen; Tiina Berg; Martin Schalling; Michael Schuster; Christoph Bock; Stefan N Constantinescu; Mario Cazzola; Robert Kralovics
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Correlation of mutation profile and response in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib.

Authors:  Keyur P Patel; Kate J Newberry; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Elias Jabbour; Sherry Pierce; Jorge Cortes; Rajesh Singh; Meenakshi Mehrotra; Mark J Routbort; Madan Luthra; Taghi Manshouri; Fabio P Santos; Hagop Kantarjian; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Andrew J Dunbar; Raajit K Rampal; Ross Levine
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Genetic and epigenetic alterations of myeloproliferative disorders.

Authors:  Jelena D Milosevic; Robert Kralovics
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Myeloid neoplasias: what molecular analyses are telling us.

Authors:  Luciana M Gutiyama; Diego F Coutinho; Marina V Lipkin; Ilana R Zalcberg
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-09-27

Review 10.  Genetic basis of MPN: Beyond JAK2-V617F.

Authors:  Nicole C C Them; Robert Kralovics
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.