Literature DB >> 22886983

Squat, stoop, or semi-squat: a comparative experiment on lifting technique.

Zhenglun Wang1, Lei Wu1, Jingzhi Sun1, Lihua He2, Sheng Wang2, Lei Yang3.   

Abstract

There are actually no sufficient data for lifting technique assessment. A laboratory study was undertaken to determine the effect of 3 regular lifting techniques on erector muscle activation, cardiovascular strain and subjective response. Thirty student volunteers participated in the study, and were required to lift a weight with different techniques. Stoop-, squat-, semi-squat-lifting resulted in 3, 2 and 1 time of the highest percentage of the maximum voluntary electrical activation (MVE%) respectively. In the same order, the lowest median frequency (MF) existed 1, 1 and 2 times. Muscle fatigue was 4 times in squat, 36 in semi-squat and 43 in stoop lifting. Heart rate was the highest in squat and lowest in stoop respectively, with a middle level in semi-squat lifting. It may be recommended to adopt mainly the semi-squat technique for daily lifting works. For heavy lifting, it should use the squat technique. Stoop lifting may also be used alternatively but for light things.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886983     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-012-1009-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  6 in total

Review 1.  Methodologies for evaluating electromyographic field data in ergonomics.

Authors:  G M Hägg; A Luttmann; M Jäger
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Comparison of Fourier and wavelet transform procedures for examining the mechanomyographic and electromyographic frequency domain responses during fatiguing isokinetic muscle actions of the biceps brachii.

Authors:  Travis W Beck; Terry J Housh; Glen O Johnson; Joseph P Weir; Joel T Cramer; Jared W Coburn; Moh H Malek
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Electromyographical study on surgeons in urology. I. Influence of the operating technique on muscular strain.

Authors:  A Luttmann; J Sökeland; W Laurig
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Influence of lifting technique on perceptual and cardiovascular responses to submaximal repetitive lifting.

Authors:  K B Hagen; K Harms-Ringdahl; J Hallén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

5.  Surface electromyography assessment of back muscle intrinsic properties.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; A Bertrand Arsenault; Denis Gravel; Denis Gagnon; Patrick Loisel
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Use of the surface EMG signal for performance evaluation of back muscles.

Authors:  C J De Luca
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.217

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Lifting Techniques: Why Are We Not Using Evidence To Optimize Movement?

Authors:  Nicholas B Washmuth; Abby D McAfee; C Scott Bickel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01

2.  Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model.

Authors:  Mark Tröster; Sarah Budde; Christophe Maufroy; Michael Skipper Andersen; John Rasmussen; Urs Schneider; Thomas Bauernhansl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.