Literature DB >> 22886712

Treatment patterns in the first year after initiating tumor necrosis factor blockers in real-world settings.

Machaon Bonafede1, Kathleen M Fox, Crystal Watson, Nicole Princic, Shravanthi R Gandra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers are approved for use in several immune-related conditions, but treatment patterns, such as switching between TNF blockers or restarting treatment after a gap in therapy, are not clearly established. This analysis examined TNF blocker treatment patterns within the first year after initiating treatment with etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis.
METHODS: Administrative claims data from the MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (Thomson Reuters, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) were analyzed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis who were continuously enrolled and newly initiated etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab treatment between January 1, 2005 and July 1, 2009. Persistence (no treatment gap ≥45 days), restarting index therapy (after a ≥45-day treatment gap), switching to a different biologic of interest (certolizumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, alefacept, abatacept, rituximab, or tocilizumab), and stopping (≥45-day treatment gap with no restart or switch) were analyzed for the first year after the index date.
RESULTS: A total of 8,454 patients had an index claim for etanercept (n = 4,224), adalimumab (n = 2,941), or infliximab (n = 1,289). Treatment patterns in the first year across all four conditions combined for etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab, respectively, were: persistence, 42%, 47%, and 56%; restarting, 25%, 19%, and 12%; switching, 13%, 12%, and 13%; and stopping, 20%, 22%, and 19%. The combined rates of either persistence or restarting initial therapy after a treatment gap were 67%, 66%, and 68%, for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab, respectively. Most switches (66-92%) were between the three TNF blockers.
CONCLUSION: In the first year after initiating TNF blocker therapy, patients often have a ≥45-day treatment gap; however, approximately two-thirds of patients are either persistent with or restart their index therapy in the year following TNF blocker initiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886712     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-012-0037-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  29 in total

1.  Patterns of Systemic Treatment for Psoriatic Arthritis in the US: 2004-2015.

Authors:  Moa P Lee; Joyce Lii; Yinzhu Jin; Rishi J Desai; Daniel H Solomon; Joseph F Merola; Seoyoung C Kim
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Persistence of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy or combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Philip J Mease; Neil A Accortt; Sabrina Rebello; Carol J Etzel; Ryan W Harrison; Girish A Aras; Mahdi M F Gharaibeh; Jeffrey D Greenberg; David H Collier
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Initiation, Switching, and Cessation of Psoriasis Treatments Among Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in the United States.

Authors:  April W Armstrong; J Will Koning; Simon Rowse; Huaming Tan; Carla Mamolo; Mandeep Kaur
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Treatment Persistence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After a Change in Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Machaon M K Bonafede; Donna McMorrow; Clare Proudfoot; Shraddha Shinde; Andreas Kuznik; Chieh-I Chen
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2018-06

5.  Treatment patterns in psoriatic arthritis patients newly initiated on oral nonbiologic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Authors:  Huabin F Zhang; Geneviève Gauthier; Robert Hiscock; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.156

6.  Treatment patterns and costs for anti-TNFα biologic therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Jacqueline B Palmer; Yunfeng Li; Vivian Herrera; Minlei Liao; Melody Tran; Zafer E Ozturk
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Comparison of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy Persistence Between Biologics Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Switching from Another Biologic.

Authors:  Stephen S Johnston; Donna McMorrow; Amanda M Farr; Paul Juneau; Sarika Ogale
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2014-12-23

8.  Clinical Outcomes and Biologic Costs of Switching Between Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in US Veterans with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Grant W Cannon; Scott L DuVall; Candace L Haroldsen; Liron Caplan; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kaleb Michaud; Ted R Mikuls; Andreas Reimold; David H Collier; George J Joseph; David J Harrison; Brian C Sauer
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Adverse events of anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Qiang Tong; Qing Cai; Tristan de Mooij; Xia Xu; Shengming Dai; Wenchun Qu; Dongbao Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Treatment persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Marina Amaral de Ávila Machado; Cristiano Soares de Moura; Felipe Ferré; Sasha Bernatsky; Elham Rahme; Francisco de Assis Acurcio
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.