Literature DB >> 22886547

How conservative are evolutionary anthropologists?: a survey of political attitudes.

Henry F Lyle1, Eric A Smith.   

Abstract

The application of evolutionary theory to human behavior has elicited a variety of critiques, some of which charge that this approach expresses or encourages conservative or reactionary political agendas. In a survey of graduate students in psychology, Tybur, Miller, and Gangestad (Human Nature, 18, 313-328, 2007) found that the political attitudes of those who use an evolutionary approach did not differ from those of other psychology grad students. Here, we present results from a directed online survey of a broad sample of graduate students in anthropology that assays political views. We found that evolutionary anthropology graduate students were very liberal in their political beliefs, overwhelmingly voted for a liberal U.S. presidential candidate in the 2008 election, and identified with liberal political parties; in this, they were almost indistinguishable from non-evolutionary anthropology students. Our results contradict the view that evolutionary anthropologists hold conservative or reactionary political views. We discuss some possible reasons for the persistence of this view in terms of the sociology of science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886547     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9150-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  8 in total

1.  Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the perplexed.

Authors:  E A. Smith; M B. Mulder; K Hill
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Scientific community. Anthropological warfare.

Authors:  C C Mann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The limitations of medical ecology: the concept of adaptation in the context of social stratification and social transformation.

Authors:  M Singer
Journal:  Med Anthropol       Date:  1989-04

4.  Testing the Controversy : An Empirical Examination of Adaptationists' Attitudes Toward Politics and Science.

Authors:  Joshua M Tybur; Geoffrey F Miller; Steven W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-12

Review 5.  Is sociobiology reactionary? The political implications of inclusive-fitness theory.

Authors:  R D Masters
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.875

Review 6.  Endless forms: human behavioural diversity and evolved universals.

Authors:  Eric Alden Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Farewell to adaptationism: unnatural selection and the politics of biology.

Authors:  M Singer
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  1996-12

8.  Raising Darwin's consciousness : Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy.

Authors:  S B Hrdy
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1997-03
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Modernizing Evolutionary Anthropology : Introduction to the Special Issue.

Authors:  Siobhán M Mattison; Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-12

2.  Sex offender registries: exploring the attitudes and knowledge of political decision-makers.

Authors:  Sandy Jung; Meredith Allison; Carissa Toop; Erin Martin
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-05-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.