Literature DB >> 22886078

Supracricoid partial laryngectomy: analyses of oncologic and functional outcomes.

Ercan Pinar1, Abdulkadir Imre, Caglar Calli, Semih Oncel, Huseyin Katilmis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the functional and oncologic results of supracricoid partial laryngectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. SUBJECT AND METHODS: The medical records of 56 patients, who underwent supracricoid partial laryngectomy between March 2002 and December 2010, were reviewed in this study. Forty-three patients underwent supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy, and 13 patients underwent cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. The overall and disease-specific survival, local control rates, and the mean time of decannulation and nasogastric tube removal were evaluated. Association of type of surgery with the functional and oncologic outcomes was evaluated and statistically compared.
RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 58 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100%, 96.4%, and 82.1%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rates were 100%, 96.1%, and 92.5%, respectively. Type of surgery did not show any significant difference in survival and local control rates (P = .546, P = .455). The mean (SD) decannulation and nasogastric feeding tube removal time was 11.43 (2.03) and 16.79 (3.51) days, respectively. The mean time of decannulation and nasogastric tube removal was significantly longer in patients who underwent cricohyoidopexy when compared with those who underwent cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (P = .002, P = .000).
CONCLUSION: Although delaying deglutition functions could be termed a disadvantage of supracricoid laryngectomy, especially with cricohyoidopexy, supracricoid laryngectomy has reliable oncologic and functional results for locally advanced laryngeal cancers while maintaining laryngeal functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886078     DOI: 10.1177/0194599812457334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  19 in total

Review 1.  Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy: what do we not know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Nicole Pizzorni; Francesco Mozzanica; Marco Fantini; Daniela Ginocchio; Andy Bertolin; Erika Crosetti; Giovanni Succo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  The Penetration-Aspiration Scale: Adaptation to Open Partial Laryngectomy and Reliability Analysis.

Authors:  Nicole Pizzorni; Erika Crosetti; Elena Santambrogio; Giada de Cillis; Andy Bertolin; Giuseppe Rizzotto; Marco Fantini; Giovanni Succo; Antonio Schindler
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Relationship between swallowing-related quality of life and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in patients who underwent open partial horizontal laryngectomy.

Authors:  Nicole Pizzorni; Antonio Schindler; Marco Fantini; Andy Bertolin; Giuseppe Rizzotto; Federico Ambrogi; Giovanni Succo; Erika Crosetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Multi-modality management for loco-regionally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: balancing the benefit of efficacy and functional preservation.

Authors:  Wei Qian; Guopei Zhu; Yulong Wang; Xiaoshen Wang; Qinghai Ji; Yu Wang; Shengjin Dou
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Analyses of functional and oncologic outcomes following supracricoid partial laryngectomy.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Xiaotian Li; Zimin Pan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  The senile functional evolution of the larynx after supracricoid reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Agostino Serra; Luigi Maiolino; Paola Di Mauro; Luisa Licciardello; Salvatore Cocuzza
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Analysis of swallowing after partial frontolateral laryngectomy with epiglottic reconstruction for glottic cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Fakhry; Justin Michel; Roch Giorgi; Danielle Robert; Aude Lagier; Laure Santini; Eric Moreddu; Laurent Puymerail; Pascal Adalian; Patrick Dessi; Antoine Giovanni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Function preservation using transoral laser surgery for T2-T3 glottic cancer: oncologic, vocal, and swallowing outcomes.

Authors:  Giorgio Peretti; Cesare Piazza; Francesca Del Bon; Renzo Mora; Paola Grazioli; Diego Barbieri; Stefano Mangili; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Attempt to improve functional outcomes in supracricoid laryngectomy in T2b and T3 glottic cancers.

Authors:  Małgorzata Leszczyńska; Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Maciej Tokarski; Witold Szyfter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.