BACKGROUND: Trauma registry data are almost always incomplete. Multiple imputation can reduce bias in registry analyses but the ideal approach would be to improve data capture. The aim of this study was to identify, using multiple imputation, which type of patients were most likely to have incomplete data. METHODS: An analysis of prospectively collected regional trauma registry data over one year was performed. Analyses were conducted following complete data estimation using multiple imputation. Variables necessary for TRISS analysis and with incomplete data were analysed. For each variable, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of missingness. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 2520 cases. The variables with the greatest proportion of missing observations were respiratory rate, GCS, Qualifier (of GCS and respiratory rate) and systolic blood pressure. The Qualifier variable described whether or not the patient was intubated and mechanically ventilated at the time the first hospital GCS and respiratory rate were recorded. GCS and respiratory rate were more likely to be missing (imputed) when abnormal (unadjusted ORs: 8.6 (p<0.001) and 2.1 (p=0.02), respectively). The most important determinant of a valid GCS or respiratory rate was the Qualifier. There was no association between whether the systolic blood pressure and Qualifier were missing (imputed) and whether they were estimated to be abnormal. Following multivariable analysis, data for all four variables were more likely to be missing when the patient died in hospital. Additional independent predictors of a missing GCS or respiratory rate were an abnormal pre-hospital GCS and severe chest injury. The Qualifier and systolic blood pressure were more likely to be missing where the patient was transferred from the primary hospital. CONCLUSION: The major independent predictor of missing primary hospital physiological variables was death in hospital. An abnormal GCS was more likely to be missing from the regional trauma registry dataset. Predictors of a missing GCS or respiratory rate included whether the patient was intubated, an abnormal pre-hospital GCS and severe chest injury. Augmenting resources to record the initial observations of the more severely injured patients would improve data quality. Multiple imputation can be used to inform data capture.
BACKGROUND:Trauma registry data are almost always incomplete. Multiple imputation can reduce bias in registry analyses but the ideal approach would be to improve data capture. The aim of this study was to identify, using multiple imputation, which type of patients were most likely to have incomplete data. METHODS: An analysis of prospectively collected regional trauma registry data over one year was performed. Analyses were conducted following complete data estimation using multiple imputation. Variables necessary for TRISS analysis and with incomplete data were analysed. For each variable, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of missingness. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 2520 cases. The variables with the greatest proportion of missing observations were respiratory rate, GCS, Qualifier (of GCS and respiratory rate) and systolic blood pressure. The Qualifier variable described whether or not the patient was intubated and mechanically ventilated at the time the first hospital GCS and respiratory rate were recorded. GCS and respiratory rate were more likely to be missing (imputed) when abnormal (unadjusted ORs: 8.6 (p<0.001) and 2.1 (p=0.02), respectively). The most important determinant of a valid GCS or respiratory rate was the Qualifier. There was no association between whether the systolic blood pressure and Qualifier were missing (imputed) and whether they were estimated to be abnormal. Following multivariable analysis, data for all four variables were more likely to be missing when the patient died in hospital. Additional independent predictors of a missing GCS or respiratory rate were an abnormal pre-hospital GCS and severe chest injury. The Qualifier and systolic blood pressure were more likely to be missing where the patient was transferred from the primary hospital. CONCLUSION: The major independent predictor of missing primary hospital physiological variables was death in hospital. An abnormal GCS was more likely to be missing from the regional trauma registry dataset. Predictors of a missing GCS or respiratory rate included whether the patient was intubated, an abnormal pre-hospital GCS and severe chest injury. Augmenting resources to record the initial observations of the more severely injured patients would improve data quality. Multiple imputation can be used to inform data capture.
Authors: Gowri Shivasabesan; Gerard M O'Reilly; Joseph Mathew; Mark C Fitzgerald; Amit Gupta; Nobhojit Roy; Manjul Joshipura; Naveen Sharma; Peter Cameron; Madonna Fahey; Teresa Howard; Zoe Cheung; Vineet Kumar; Bhavesh Jarwani; Kapil Dev Soni; Pankaj Patel; Advait Thakor; Mahesh Misra; Russell L Gruen; Biswadev Mitra Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: J A Llompart-Pou; M Chico-Fernández; M Sánchez-Casado; R Salaberria-Udabe; C Carbayo-Górriz; F Guerrero-López; J González-Robledo; M Á Ballesteros-Sanz; R Herrán-Monge; L Servià-Goixart; R León-López; E Val-Jordán Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Henry E Rice; Brian R Englum; Jennifer Rothman; Sarah Leonard; Audra Reiter; Courtney Thornburg; Mary Brindle; Nicola Wright; Matthew M Heeney; Charles Smithers; Rebeccah L Brown; Theodosia Kalfa; Jacob C Langer; Michaela Cada; Keith T Oldham; J Paul Scott; Shawn St Peter; Mukta Sharma; Andrew M Davidoff; Kerri Nottage; Kathryn Bernabe; David B Wilson; Sanjeev Dutta; Bertil Glader; Shelley E Crary; Melvin S Dassinger; Levette Dunbar; Saleem Islam; Manjusha Kumar; Fred Rescorla; Steve Bruch; Andrew Campbell; Mary Austin; Robert Sidonio; Martin L Blakely Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Randall S Burd; Aaron R Jensen; John M VanBuren; Jessica S Alvey; Rachel Richards; Richard Holubkov; Murray M Pollack Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Katherine Dang; Stephen Bent; Brittany Lawton; Tracy Warren; Felicia Widjaja; Michael G McDonald; Michael Breard; Whitney O'Keefe; Robert L Hendren Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Kristin Tønsager; Marius Rehn; Kjetil G Ringdal; Hans Morten Lossius; Ilkka Virkkunen; Øyvind Østerås; Jo Røislien; Andreas J Krüger Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Elizabeth Miranda; Lotta Velin; Faustin Ntirenganya; Robert Riviello; Francoise Mukagaju; Ian Shyaka; Yves Nezerwa; Laura Pompermaier Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 1.845