Literature DB >> 22884756

Microcirculatory fraction (MCF(I)) as a potential imaging marker for tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Xiangyu Yang1, Ewa Mrozek, Maryam Lustberg, Guang Jia, Steffen Sammet, Christina Sammet, Charles Shapiro, Michael V Knopp.   

Abstract

Cancer is a heterogeneous disease by nature. Current imaging studies usually ignore intratumor variability in imaging biomarkers. We postulate that quantifying tumor heterogeneity with imaging techniques can provide useful information about cancer biology and potentially serve as novel imaging biomarkers. In this retrospective study, we identify a potential imaging marker, the microcirculatory fraction (MCF(I)), that quantifies tumor heterogeneity in normoxic/hypoxic cellular composition. We demonstrate its application on a test population of 22 women with stage II/III HER-2 negative breast cancer receiving antiangiogenic-cytotoxic combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Early change in MCF(I) (ΔMCF(I)) is assessed with dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at the end of Cycle 2 and associated with pathologic response. Its performance is compared with other established volumetric imaging biomarkers (initial tumor volume and volume change) by statistical and graphic methods. We demonstrate that a significant (P<.01) difference in ΔMCF(I) can be detected between good (median ΔMCF(I) 0.27) and poor (median ΔMCF(I) -0.12) responders, despite the limited population size. Differences in the volumetric biomarkers are not statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristic analysis also shows that ΔMCF(I) is a good predictor for pathologic response (AUC=0.86, 95% CI 0.69-1.00, P<.01), while predictions made with the established volumetric biomarkers are not significantly better than random guesses. We conclude that ΔMCF(I) has the potential of being a better predictive biomarker for therapeutic response assessment. Our findings support our postulation that quantifying tumor heterogeneity with imaging techniques can provide additional information that can serve as novel biomarkers.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22884756      PMCID: PMC3645932          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  41 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Debasish Tripathy; Dulcy S Wolverton; Hope S Rugo; E Shelley Hwang; Cheryl A Ewing; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Hypoxia-induced dedifferentiation of tumor cells--a mechanism behind heterogeneity and aggressiveness of solid tumors.

Authors:  Håkan Axelson; Erik Fredlund; Marie Ovenberger; Göran Landberg; Sven Påhlman
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 4.  Tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  G H Heppner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Doxorubicin gradients in human breast cancer.

Authors:  J Lankelma; H Dekker; F R Luque; S Luykx; K Hoekman; P van der Valk; P J van Diest; H M Pinedo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy.

Authors:  I C Smith; A E Welch; A W Hutcheon; I D Miller; S Payne; F Chilcott; S Waikar; T Whitaker; A K Ah-See; O Eremin; S D Heys; F J Gilbert; P F Sharp
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Molecular mechanisms of resistance to tumour anti-angiogenic strategies.

Authors:  Renaud Grépin; Gilles Pagès
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 8.  Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain; Dan G Duda; Christopher G Willett; Dushyant V Sahani; Andrew X Zhu; Jay S Loeffler; Tracy T Batchelor; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Quantitative metrics of net proliferation and invasion link biological aggressiveness assessed by MRI with hypoxia assessed by FMISO-PET in newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

Authors:  Mindy D Szeto; Gargi Chakraborty; Jennifer Hadley; Russ Rockne; Mark Muzi; Ellsworth C Alvord; Kenneth A Krohn; Alexander M Spence; Kristin R Swanson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Variability of tumor response to chemotherapy. II. Contribution of tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  L Simpson-Herren; P E Noker; S D Wagoner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lejla Alic; Wiro J Niessen; Jifke F Veenland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Virostko; Allison Hainline; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Stephanie L Barnes; Jeffrey D Blume; Sarah Avery; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Thomas E Yankeelov; Anna G Sorace
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-11-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.