Literature DB >> 22884534

Effectiveness of sepsis bundle application in cirrhotic patients with septic shock: a single-center experience.

Laura Rinaldi1, Elena Ferrari, Marco Marietta, Lara Donno, Davide Trevisan, Mauro Codeluppi, Stefano Busani, Massimo Girardis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of adherence to evidence-based guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) on the outcome of cirrhotic patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit.
METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study included 38 patients with documented liver cirrhosis and septic shock admitted to a multidisciplinary intensive care unit at a University Hospital from January 2005 to June 2009. In each patient, the compliance to 4 resuscitation (ie, 6-hour bundle) and to 3 management (i.e. 24-hour bundle) interventions recommended by the SSC guidelines and the 30-day mortality were measured.
RESULTS: The 6-hour, 24-hour, and all bundles were completed in 50 %, 52%, and 39% of the patients, respectively. The characteristics at admission and the 30-day mortality of patients with all-bundle compliance (n = 15; mortality 86.6%) were similar to those of patients without bundle compliance (n = 23; mortality 78.2%), except for central venous O2 saturation. Unadjusted and adjusted regression analysis showed that none of the single sepsis interventions and bundles were independently associated with 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: In our observational study, the adherence to the interventions recommended by the SSC evidence-based guidelines did not provide an improvement in the survival rate of cirrhotic patients with septic shock.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22884534     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  5 in total

Review 1.  Tidal volume and plateau pressure use for acute lung injury from 2000 to present: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Dharmvir S Jaswal; Janice M Leung; Junfeng Sun; Xizhong Cui; Yan Li; Steven Kern; Judith Welsh; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Early management of sepsis with emphasis on early goal directed therapy: AME evidence series 002.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Yucai Hong; Nathan J Smischney; Han-Pin Kuo; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Jordi Rello; Win Sen Kuan; Christian Jung; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Marc Leone; Herbert Spapen; David Grimaldi; Sven Van Poucke; Steven Q Simpson; Patrick M Honore; Stefan Hofer; Pietro Caironi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Low-dose corticosteroids for adult patients with septic shock: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Sofie Louise Rygård; Ethan Butler; Anders Granholm; Morten Hylander Møller; Jeremy Cohen; Simon Finfer; Anders Perner; John Myburgh; Balasubramanian Venkatesh; Anthony Delaney
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Effectiveness of sepsis bundle application and outcomes predictors to cirrhotic patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Yong-Ye Yang; Yin-Chou Hsu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 5.  Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.

Authors:  H Bryant Nguyen; Anja Kathrin Jaehne; Namita Jayaprakash; Matthew W Semler; Sara Hegab; Angel Coz Yataco; Geneva Tatem; Dhafer Salem; Steven Moore; Kamran Boka; Jasreen Kaur Gill; Jayna Gardner-Gray; Jacqueline Pflaum; Juan Pablo Domecq; Gina Hurst; Justin B Belsky; Raymond Fowkes; Ronald B Elkin; Steven Q Simpson; Jay L Falk; Daniel J Singer; Emanuel P Rivers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.