Literature DB >> 22884098

Risk stratification for advanced proximal colon neoplasm and individualized endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer by a risk-scoring model.

Hye Won Park1, Seungbong Han, Jong-Soo Lee, Hye-Sook Chang, Don Lee, Jae-Won Choe, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jin-Ho Kim, Jeong-Sik Byeon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only 30% to 40% of patients with advanced proximal neoplasms (APN) have distal colon neoplasms.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a risk score model for APN and propose an individualized screening protocol for colorectal cancer.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: Derivation cohort (6200 adults) and validation cohort (1389 adults). INTERVENTION: Screening colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: An APN risk score model was developed from the derivation cohort (6200 adults) and was tested in the validation cohort (1389 adults), who underwent screening colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Age, male sex, and smoking were clinical risk factors for APN. The presence of a distal neoplasm was a sigmoidoscopic risk factor for APN. We calculated APN risk scores (0-8) based on these variables and classified patients as low risk (0-2) or high risk (3-8). In the validation cohort, the relative risk of APN was 3.5-fold higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. Our model suggests that colonoscopy should be performed as an initial screening test in patients with a high clinical risk for APN. Sigmoidoscopy should be performed initially in patients with low clinical risk for APN followed by supplementary colonoscopy in those with high APN risk scores based on both clinical and sigmoidoscopic risk factors. This protocol detected APN in 22 of 34 APN+ patients (64.7%) with little increase in the endoscopy burden, whereas only 16 of 34 APN+ patients (47.1%) would be identified by initial sigmoidoscopy followed by colonoscopy only in cases with distal neoplasms. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design.
CONCLUSION: Our APN risk score model provides an algorithm for efficient screening of colorectal cancer by sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22884098     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  9 in total

1.  The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Simon Lucas Goede; Linda Rabeneck; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ann G Zauber; Lawrence F Paszat; Jeffrey S Hoch; Jean H E Yong; Frank van Hees; Jill Tinmouth; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Prediction of the Risk of a Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasm Using a Novel Scoring System.

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Hye Won Park; Min-Ju Kim; Jong-Soo Lee; Ho-Su Lee; Hye-Sook Chang; Jaewon Choe; Sung Wook Hwang; Dong-Hoon Yang; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Risk of Advanced Neoplasia Using the National Cancer Institute's Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Menggang Yu; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; Rebeka Tabbey; Elizabeth Glowinski; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  The Association between Distal Findings and Proximal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jason L W Huang; Y H Wang; Johnny Y Jiang; C P Yu; Y L Wu; P Chen; X Q Yuan; Harry H X Wang; Martin C S Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  New scoring systems for predicting advanced proximal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults with or without knowing distal colorectal findings: a prospective, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.164

6.  Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System to Stratify Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; Elizabeth A Glowinski; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  An algorithm to predict advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia in Chinese asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Jason Liwen Huang; Ping Chen; Xiaoqin Yuan; Yunlin Wu; Harry Haoxiang Wang; Martin Chisang Wong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Periodontitis is associated with an increased risk for proximal colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Gun Woo Kim; Young-Sang Kim; Soo Hyun Lee; Seung Geon Park; Duk Hwan Kim; Joo Young Cho; Ki Baik Hahm; Sung Pyo Hong; Jun-Hwan Yoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Development and validation of a scoring system for advanced colorectal neoplasm in young Korean subjects less than age 50 years.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Kim; Sungkyoung Choi; Taesung Park; Seul Ki Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Jung Ho Park; Hong Joo Kim; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Dong Il Park
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-11-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.