Literature DB >> 22883148

UV index values and trends in Santiago, Chile (33.5°S) based on ground and satellite data.

Sergio Cabrera1, Adriana Ipiña, Alessandro Damiani, Raul R Cordero, Rubén D Piacentini.   

Abstract

We report on the surface UV index (UVI) variations in Santiago (Chile) a city with high air pollution and complex surrounding topography. Ground-based UV measurements were continuously carried out between January 1995 and December 2011, by using a multi-channel filter radiometer (PUV-510). Ground-based measurements and satellite-derived data retrieved from the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS), the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), and the Scanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY), were compared. We found that satellite-derived UVI products largely overestimate surface UVI. Our ground-based UVI measurements were significantly lower than TOMS-derived UVI data: (46.1±6.3)% (in the period 1997-2003), and OMI-derived UVI data: (47.0±6.3)% (in the period 2005-2007). Clear-sky SCIAMACHY-derived UVI were found to be also nearly systematically greater than ground-based UVI measurements in the period 2002-2011. An exceptionally long period of clear skies between December 2010 and January 2011 was used to test further satellite-derived UVI data; in the whole period, OMI and SCIAMACHY data were 53.1% and 38.3% greater than our ground-based measurements, respectively. These differences are presumably due to aerosol load associated with the local pollution and the complex topography surrounding Santiago. In addition, linear regression allowed us to estimate trends that we use for forecasting. Methodological details are provided below.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22883148     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2012.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B        ISSN: 1011-1344            Impact factor:   6.252


  4 in total

1.  Temporal Trends in Satellite-Derived Erythemal UVB and Implications for Ambient Sun Exposure Assessment.

Authors:  Marvin Langston; Leslie Dennis; Charles Lynch; Denise Roe; Heidi Brown
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, Update 2021.

Authors:  P W Barnes; T M Robson; P J Neale; C E Williamson; R G Zepp; S Madronich; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; A M Heikkilä; G H Bernhard; A F Bais; R E Neale; J F Bornman; M A K Jansen; A R Klekociuk; J Martinez-Abaigar; S A Robinson; Q-W Wang; A T Banaszak; D-P Häder; S Hylander; K C Rose; S-Å Wängberg; B Foereid; W-C Hou; R Ossola; N D Paul; J E Ukpebor; M P S Andersen; J Longstreth; T Schikowski; K R Solomon; B Sulzberger; L S Bruckman; K K Pandey; C C White; L Zhu; M Zhu; P J Aucamp; J B Liley; R L McKenzie; M Berwick; S N Byrne; L M Hollestein; R M Lucas; C M Olsen; L E Rhodes; S Yazar; A R Young
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Daily changes on seasonal ecophysiological responses of the intertidal brown macroalga Lessonia spicata: Implications of climate change.

Authors:  Paula S M Celis-Plá; Andres Trabal; Camilo Navarrete; Macarena Troncoso; Fabiola Moenne; Antonio Zúñiga; Félix L Figueroa; Claudio A Sáez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  UV irradiance and albedo at Union Glacier Camp (Antarctica): a case study.

Authors:  Raul R Cordero; Alessandro Damiani; Jorge Ferrer; Jose Jorquera; Mario Tobar; Fernando Labbe; Jorge Carrasco; David Laroze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.