Literature DB >> 22882967

A systematic review of systematic reviews of interventions to improve maternal mental health and well-being.

Fiona Alderdice1, Jenny McNeill, Fiona Lynn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to identify non-invasive interventions in the perinatal period that could enable midwives to offer effective support to women within the area of maternal mental health and well-being.
METHODS: a total of 9 databases were searched: MEDLINE, PubMed, EBSCO (CINAHL/British Nursing Index), MIDIRS Online Database, Web of Science, The Cochrane library, CRD (NHS EED/DARE/HTA), Joanne Briggs Institute and EconLit. A systematic search strategy was formulated using key MeSH terms and related text words for midwifery, study aim, study design and mental health. Inclusion criteria were articles published from 1999 onwards, English language publications and articles originating from economically developed countries, indicated by membership of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Data were independently extracted using a data collection form, which recorded data on the number of papers reviewed, time frame of the review, objectives, key findings and recommendations. Summary data tables were set up outlining key data for each study and findings were organised into related groups. The methodological quality of the reviews was assessed based on predefined quality assessment criteria for reviews.
FINDINGS: 32 reviews were identified as examining interventions that could be used or co-ordinated by midwives in relation to some aspect of maternal mental health and well-being from the antenatal to the postnatal period and met the inclusion criteria. The review highlighted that based on current systematic review evidence it would be premature to consider introducing any of the identified interventions into midwifery training or practice. However there were a number of examples of possible interventions worthy of further research including midwifery led models of care in the prevention of postpartum depression, psychological and psychosocial interventions for treating postpartum depression and facilitation/co-ordination of parent-training programmes. No reviews were identified that supported a specific midwifery role in maternal mental health and well-being in pregnancy, and yet, this is the point of most intensive contact. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This systematic review of systematic reviews provides a valuable overview of the current strengths and gaps in relation to maternal mental health interventions in the perinatal period. While there was little evidence identified to inform the current role of midwives in maternal mental health, the review provides the opportunity to reflect on what is achievable by midwives now and in the future and the need for high quality randomised controlled trials to inform a strategic approach to promoting maternal mental health in midwifery.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22882967     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  19 in total

1.  The Structural Model of Spirituality and Psychological Well-Being for Pregnancy-Specific Stress.

Authors:  Mahrokh Dolatian; Zohreh Mahmoodi; Taibeh Dilgony; Jamal Shams; Farid Zaeri
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2017-12

Review 2.  Fidelity of Interventions to Reduce or Prevent Stress and/or Anxiety from Pregnancy up to Two Years Postpartum: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gregory Gorman; Elaine Toomey; Caragh Flannery; Sarah Redsell; Catherine Hayes; Anja Huizink; Patricia M Kearney; Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-25

3.  The Use of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and the RAND VSQ9 to Measure the Quality of Life and Visit-Specific Satisfaction of Pregnant Patients Under Chiropractic Care Utilizing the Webster Technique.

Authors:  Joel Alcantara; Andrea Lamont Nazarenko; Jeanne Ohm; Junjoe Alcantara
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.579

4.  Preconception depression and anxiety symptoms and maternal-infant bonding: a 20-year intergenerational cohort study.

Authors:  Craig A Olsson; Elizabeth A Spry; Yvette Alway; Margarita Moreno-Betancur; George Youssef; Christopher Greenwood; Primrose Letcher; Jacqui A Macdonald; Jennifer McIntosh; Delyse Hutchinson; George C Patton
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities.

Authors:  Lorcan Clarke; Michael Anderson; Rob Anderson; Morten Bonde Klausen; Rebecca Forman; Jenna Kerns; Adrian Rabe; Søren Rud Kristensen; Pavlos Theodorakis; Jose Valderas; Hans Kluge; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Evaluation of an Inpatient Psychiatric Mother-Baby Unit Using a Patient Reported Experience and Outcome Measure.

Authors:  Grace Branjerdporn; Carly Hudson; Roy Sheshinski; Linda Parlato; Lyndall Healey; Aleshia Ellis; Alice Reid; Catherine Finnerty; Rachelle Arnott; Rebecca Curtain; Miranda McLean; Snehal Parmar; Susan Roberts
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The impact of COVID-19 on pregnant womens' experiences and perceptions of antenatal maternity care, social support, and stress-reduction strategies.

Authors:  Sarah Meaney; Sara Leitao; Ellinor K Olander; Johanna Pope; Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.349

Review 8.  Midwifery-led antenatal care models: mapping a systematic review to an evidence-based quality framework to identify key components and characteristics of care.

Authors:  Andrew Symon; Jan Pringle; Helen Cheyne; Soo Downe; Vanora Hundley; Elaine Lee; Fiona Lynn; Alison McFadden; Jenny McNeill; Mary J Renfrew; Mary Ross-Davie; Edwin van Teijlingen; Heather Whitford; Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Public health education for midwives and midwifery students: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jenny McNeill; Jackie Doran; Fiona Lynn; Gail Anderson; Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Baby Steps - An Online Program Promoting the Well-Being of New Mothers and Fathers: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Kyra Hamilton; David Kavanagh; Jennifer Connolly; Leigh Davis; Jane Fisher; Kim Halford; Leanne Hides; Jeannette Milgrom; Heather Rowe; Davina Sanders; Paul A Scuffham; Dian Tjondronegoro; Anne Walsh; Katherine M White; Anja Wittkowski
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.