Literature DB >> 22882812

Bimanual-vertical hand movements.

Jay C Kwon1, Matthew L Cohen, John Williamson, Brandon Burtis, Kenneth M Heilman.   

Abstract

Patients often demonstrate attentional and action-intentional biases in both the transverse and coronal planes. In addition, when making forelimb movements in the transverse plane, normal participants also have spatial and magnitude asymmetries, but forelimb spatial asymmetries have not been studied in coronal space. Thus, to learn if when normal people make vertical movements they have right-left spatial and magnitude biases, seventeen healthy, blindfolded volunteers had their hands (holding pens) placed vertically in their midsagittal plane, 10 inches apart, on pieces of paper positioned above, below, and at eye-level. Participants were asked to move their hands together vertically and meet in the middle. Participants demonstrated less angular deviation in the below-eye condition than in the other spatial conditions, when moving down than up, and with their right than left hand. Movements toward eye level from upper or lower space were also more accurate than movements in the other directions. Independent of hand, lines were longer with downward than upward movements and the right hand moved more distance than the left. These attentional-intentional asymmetries may be related to gravitational force, hand-hemispheric dominance, and spatial "where" asymmetries; however, the mechanisms accounting for these asymmetries must be ascertained by future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22882812      PMCID: PMC3419484          DOI: 10.1017/S135561771100066X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  22 in total

1.  Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation.

Authors:  K M Heilman; T Van Den Abell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Altitudinal neglect.

Authors:  S Z Rapcsak; C R Cimino; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Performance on hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome.

Authors:  K M Heilman; D Bowers; R T Watson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task.

Authors:  D Bowers; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Pseudoneglect in a patient with partial callosal disconnection.

Authors:  K M Heilman; D Bowers; R T Watson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Equivalence of parieto-preoccipital subareas for visuospatial ability in monkeys.

Authors:  M Mishkin; M E Lewis; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect).

Authors:  K M Heilman; T Van Den Abell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Bodily neglect and orientational biases in unilateral neglect syndrome and normal subjects.

Authors:  V W Mark; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Peripersonal and vertical neglect.

Authors:  P A Shelton; D Bowers; K M Heilman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect.

Authors:  S Weintraub; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1987-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.