Literature DB >> 22881048

Developing procedural flexibility: are novices prepared to learn from comparing procedures?

Bethany Rittle-Johnson1, Jon R Star, Kelley Durkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A key learning outcome in problem-solving domains is the development of procedural flexibility, where learners know multiple procedures and use them appropriately to solve a range of problems (e.g., Verschaffel, Luwel, Torbeyns, & Van Dooren, 2009). However, students often fail to become flexible problem solvers in mathematics. To support flexibility, teaching standards in many countries recommend that students be exposed to multiple procedures early in instruction and be encouraged to compare them. AIMS: We experimentally evaluated this recommended instructional practice for supporting procedural flexibility during a classroom lesson, relative to two alternative conditions. The alternatives reflected the common instructional practice of delayed exposure to multiple procedures, either with or without comparison of procedures. SAMPLE: Grade 8 students from two public schools (N= 198) were randomly assigned to condition. Students had not received prior instruction on multi-step equation solving, which was the topic of our lessons.
METHOD: Students learned about multi-step equation solving under one of three conditions in math class for about 3 hr. They also completed a pre-test, post-test, and 1-month-retention test on their procedural knowledge, procedural flexibility, and conceptual knowledge of equation solving.
RESULTS: Novices who compared procedures immediately were more flexible problem solvers than those who did not, even on a 1-month retention test. Although condition had limited direct impact on conceptual and procedural knowledge, greater flexibility was associated with greater knowledge of both types.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparing procedures can support flexibility in novices and early introduction to multiple procedures may be one important reason. ©2011 The British Psychological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22881048     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0007-0998


  5 in total

1.  Executive Function in Learning Mathematics by Comparison: Incorporating Everyday Classrooms into the Science of Learning.

Authors:  Kreshnik Nasi Begolli; Lindsey Engle Richland; Susanne M Jaeggi; Emily McLaughlin Lyons; Ellen C Klostermann; Bryan J Matlen
Journal:  Think Reason       Date:  2018-02-19

2.  Inducing mental set constrains procedural flexibility and conceptual understanding in mathematics.

Authors:  Marci S DeCaro
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-10

Review 3.  Stress, Time Pressure, Strategy Selection and Math Anxiety in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sara Caviola; Emma Carey; Irene C Mammarella; Denes Szucs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01

4.  Turning Potential Flexibility Into Flexible Performance: Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy and Use of Flexible Cognition.

Authors:  Ru-De Liu; Jia Wang; Jon R Star; Rui Zhen; Rong-Huan Jiang; Xin-Chen Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-04

5.  Interleaved Learning in Elementary School Mathematics: Effects on the Flexible and Adaptive Use of Subtraction Strategies.

Authors:  Lea Nemeth; Katharina Werker; Julia Arend; Sebastian Vogel; Frank Lipowsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.