Literature DB >> 22880284

Information-seeking experiences and decision-making roles of Japanese women with breast cancer.

Mitsuyo Nakashima1, Syoji Kuroki, Harumi Shinkoda, Yoshiko Suetsugu, Kazuo Shimada, Tsunehisa Kaku.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the information-seeking experiences and decision-making roles of Japanese women with breast cancer, to examine the relationship between information-seeking experiences and decision-making roles, and to explore the factors that influenced taking a more active role than the preferred role during the treatment decision-making process.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, women with breast cancer were retrospectively administered the Control Preferences Scale and the Information-Seeking Experience Scale. The Chi-Square test was used to compare differences among individual variables in decision-making roles and information-seeking experiences. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors that influenced taking a more active role than the preferred role.
RESULTS: One hundred and four patients with breast cancer participated in the investigation. Eighty-five patients (78%) perceived themselves as having knowledge of breast cancer and most patients (92%) sought information on breast cancer. The preferred roles in decision-making that they reported having before treatment were 18% active, 69% collaborative and 13% passive. The actual roles they perceived having experienced were 27% active, 43% collaborative and 30% passive. Although there was concordance of preferred and actual role for only 59% of the women, most patients reported that they were satisfied with their decision-making. Many women with breast cancer reported negative experiences with information seeking, including wanting more information (49%), expending a lot of effort to obtain the information needed (53%), not having enough time to obtain needed information (55%), frustration during the search for information (44%), concerns about the quality of the information (45%) and difficulty understanding the information received (49%). This study revealed that having a more active actual role than the initial preferred role was associated with emotional expression to the physician, having undergone mastectomy, and the desire for more information.
CONCLUSION: Most women with breast cancer sought information on breast cancer and expressed a preference for a collaborative relationship with physicians in treatment decision-making. Patients who expressed emotion to their physician, wanted more information, and underwent mastectomy were most likely to change their actual decision-making role toward a more active choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22880284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi        ISSN: 0016-254X


  7 in total

1.  Congruence between Preferred and Actual Participation Roles Increases Satisfaction with Treatment Decision Making among Japanese Women with Breast Cancer

Authors:  Keiko Yamauchi; Motoyuki Nakao; Mitsuyo Nakashima; Yoko Ishihara
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Getting the right fit: Convergence between preferred and perceived involvement in treatment decision making among medical oncology outpatients.

Authors:  Elise Mansfield; Jamie Bryant; Mariko Carey; Heidi Turon; Frans Henskens; Alice Grady
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06

3.  Correlates of regret with treatment decision-making among Japanese women with breast cancer: results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Keiko Yamauchi; Motoyuki Nakao; Mitsuyo Nakashima
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Shared decision making and patients satisfaction with strabismus care-a pilot study.

Authors:  Ala Paduca; Oleg Arnaut; Eugeniu Beschieru; Per Olof Lundmark; Jan Richard Bruenech
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Linda Brom; Wendy Hopmans; H Roeline W Pasman; Danielle R M Timmermans; Guy A M Widdershoven; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Qualitative Study of Health Information -Seeking Barriers among Mastectomy Patients.

Authors:  Masoomeh Latifi; Meghdad Sedaghat; Nilofar Barahmand; Fatemeh Fahimnia; Leili Allahbakhshian Farsani
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-11-01

7.  What Japanese Women with Breast Cancer Decide: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Web-Based Open-Ended Responses.

Authors:  Keiko Yamauchi; Mitsuyo Nakashima; Motoyuki Nakao
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.