Literature DB >> 22879677

Deltoid, triceps, or both responses improve the success rate of the interscalene catheter surgical block compared with the biceps response.

A Borgeat1, G Ekatodramis, S Guzzella, P Ruland, G Votta-Velis, J Aguirre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of the muscular response elicited by neurostimulation on the success rate of interscalene block using a catheter (ISC) is unknown. In this investigation, we compared the success rate of ISC placement as indicated by biceps or deltoid, triceps, or both twitches.
METHODS: Three hundred (ASA I-II) patients presenting for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively randomized to assessment by biceps (Group B) or deltoid, triceps, or both twitches (Group DT). All ISCs were placed with the aid of neurostimulation. The tip of the stimulating needle was placed after disappearance of either biceps or deltoid, triceps, or both twitches at 0.3 mA. The catheter was advanced 2-3 cm past the tip of the needle and the block was performed using 40 ml ropivacaine 0.5%. Successful block was defined as sensory block of the supraclavicular nerve and sensory and motor block involving the axillary, radial, median, and musculocutaneous nerves within 30 min.
RESULTS: Success rate was 98.6% in Group DT compared with 92.5% in Group B (95% confidence interval 0.01-0.11; P<0.02). Supplemental analgesics during handling of the posterior part of the shoulder capsule were needed in two patients in Group DT and seven patients in Group B. Three patients in Group B had an incomplete radial nerve distribution anaesthesia necessitating general anaesthesia. One patient in Group B had an incomplete posterior block extension of the supraclavicular nerve. No acute or late complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting deltoid, triceps, or both twitches was associated with a higher success rate compared with eliciting biceps twitches during continuous interscalene block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22879677     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  3 in total

1.  Analgesic efficacy of two interscalene blocks and one cervical epidural block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Jae-Yoon Kim; Kwang-Sup Song; Won-Joong Kim; Yong-Hee Park; Hyun Kang; Young-Cheol Woo; Hwa-Yong Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Postoperative neurologic symptoms in the operative arm after shoulder surgery with interscalene blockade: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Mutter; Gabrielle S Logan; Sam Neily; Scott Richardson; Nicole Askin; Marita Monterola; Ahmed Abou-Setta
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.713

3.  PROSPECT guideline for rotator cuff repair surgery: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

Authors:  O Toma; B Persoons; E Pogatzki-Zahn; M Van de Velde; G P Joshi
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 6.955

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.