BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest occurs in >400 000 patients in the United States per year, and mortality rates vary across the country. Whether variations in cardiac arrest outcome are the result of differences in hospital or patient characteristics remains understudied. We tested whether hospital-independent factors would account for the difference in outcome between 2 geographically distinct hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive adult (age >18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were considered for analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Predictor variables were classified according to whether they were hospital-independent or whether they could be related to the hospital's quality of care. Only hospital-independent variables were considered for the analysis. Sequential logistic modeling was used to assess outcome. A propensity score was derived and was used in subsequent multivariate logistic regression to predict hospital outcome. A total of 208 subjects were included. Overall mortality in the Detroit cohort was 87% in comparison with 61% in the Boston cohort (odds ratio: 4.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.2-8.8). After sequential adjustments for baseline covariates, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest score and propensity score, city was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio: 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.97). After propensity matching there was no significant difference in the odds ratio for death between the 2 cities (odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-2.61). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we found that pre- and intra-arrest conditions contribute substantially to the severity of the postarrest syndrome and on outcomes. Postarrest quality-of-care evaluations should include inherent differences in the presenting syndrome rather than a crude mortality rate.
BACKGROUND:Cardiac arrest occurs in >400 000 patients in the United States per year, and mortality rates vary across the country. Whether variations in cardiac arrest outcome are the result of differences in hospital or patient characteristics remains understudied. We tested whether hospital-independent factors would account for the difference in outcome between 2 geographically distinct hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive adult (age >18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were considered for analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Predictor variables were classified according to whether they were hospital-independent or whether they could be related to the hospital's quality of care. Only hospital-independent variables were considered for the analysis. Sequential logistic modeling was used to assess outcome. A propensity score was derived and was used in subsequent multivariate logistic regression to predict hospital outcome. A total of 208 subjects were included. Overall mortality in the Detroit cohort was 87% in comparison with 61% in the Boston cohort (odds ratio: 4.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.2-8.8). After sequential adjustments for baseline covariates, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest score and propensity score, city was not significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio: 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.97). After propensity matching there was no significant difference in the odds ratio for death between the 2 cities (odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-2.61). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, we found that pre- and intra-arrest conditions contribute substantially to the severity of the postarrest syndrome and on outcomes. Postarrest quality-of-care evaluations should include inherent differences in the presenting syndrome rather than a crude mortality rate.
Authors: Sabina Hunziker; Matthew J Bivens; Michael N Cocchi; Joseph Miller; Justin Salciccioli; Michael D Howell; Michael W Donnino Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Michael W Donnino; Jon C Rittenberger; David Gaieski; Michael N Cocchi; Brandon Giberson; Mary Ann Peberdy; Benjamin S Abella; Bentley J Bobrow; Clifton Callaway Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Brendan G Carr; Jeremy M Kahn; Raina M Merchant; Andrew A Kramer; Robert W Neumar Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Graham Nichol; Elizabeth Thomas; Clifton W Callaway; Jerris Hedges; Judy L Powell; Tom P Aufderheide; Tom Rea; Robert Lowe; Todd Brown; John Dreyer; Dan Davis; Ahamed Idris; Ian Stiell Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Graham Nichol; Tom P Aufderheide; Brian Eigel; Robert W Neumar; Keith G Lurie; Vincent J Bufalino; Clifton W Callaway; Venugopal Menon; Robert R Bass; Benjamin S Abella; Michael Sayre; Cynthia M Dougherty; Edward M Racht; Monica E Kleinman; Robert E O'Connor; John P Reilly; Eric W Ossmann; Eric Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alex G Garza; Matthew C Gratton; Joseph A Salomone; Daniel Lindholm; James McElroy; Rex Archer Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marc Pineton de Chambrun; Nicolas Bréchot; Guillaume Lebreton; Matthieu Schmidt; Guillaume Hekimian; Pierre Demondion; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Pascal Leprince; Jean Chastre; Alain Combes; Charles-Edouard Luyt Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Lars W Andersen; Tobias Kurth; Maureen Chase; Katherine M Berg; Michael N Cocchi; Clifton Callaway; Michael W Donnino Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-04-06
Authors: Michael W Donnino; Lars W Andersen; Katherine M Berg; Maureen Chase; Robert Sherwin; Howard Smithline; Erin Carney; Long Ngo; Parth V Patel; Xiaowen Liu; Donald Cutlip; Peter Zimetbaum; Michael N Cocchi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2016-04-03 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Anne V Grossestreuer; David F Gaieski; Michael W Donnino; Joshua I M Nelson; Eric L Mutter; Brendan G Carr; Benjamin S Abella; Douglas J Wiebe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 3.240