| Literature DB >> 22878902 |
Anand P Chokkalingam1, Catherine Metayer, Ghislaine Scelo, Jeffrey S Chang, Joshua Schiffman, Kevin Y Urayama, Xiaomei Ma, Helen M Hansen, James H Feusner, Lisa F Barcellos, John K Wiencke, Joseph L Wiemels, Patricia A Buffler.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be initiated in utero or early in the postnatal period. High birth weight (or rapid fetal growth) is associated with risk of ALL, but the mechanisms are not understood. In a population-based epidemiologic study of childhood ALL, we utilized a haplotype-based approach to assess the role of eight genes involved in fetal growth and body size regulation in 377 childhood ALL cases and 448 controls. We found significant haplotype associations with risk of childhood ALL for IGF1 among non-Hispanics and Hispanics together (p = 0.002), for IGF2 among Hispanics (p = 0.040), and for IGF2R among Hispanics and non-Hispanics (p = 0.051 and 0.009, respectively). No haplotype associations were observed for IGF1R or the studied genes involved in body size regulation, including LEP, LEPR, GHRL, and NPY. Our study is the first to identify an association between the genes involved in the IGF axis and risk of childhood ALL. These findings for childhood ALL emphasize the importance of fetal growth, when lymphoid progenitor cells are not yet fully differentiated and therefore more susceptible to malignant transformation. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and identify specific causal variants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22878902 PMCID: PMC3415610 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-0035-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Causes Control ISSN: 0957-5243 Impact factor: 2.506
Characteristics of genotyped childhood ALL cases and controls, NCCLS
| Variable | Cases | Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |
| Total | 377 | 100.0 | 448 | 100.0 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 200 | 53.1 | 237 | 52.9 |
| Female | 177 | 46.9 | 211 | 47.1 |
| Age at diagnosis or reference (year) | ||||
| Under 1 | 12 | 3.2 | 19 | 4.2 |
| 1–5 | 243 | 64.5 | 282 | 62.9 |
| 6–10 | 85 | 22.5 | 95 | 21.2 |
| 11–14 | 37 | 9.8 | 52 | 11.6 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Hispanic | 221 | 58.6 | 269 | 60.0 |
| Non-Hispanic | 156 | 41.4 | 179 | 40.0 |
| Race | ||||
| White | 214 | 56.8 | 255 | 56.9 |
| Black | 15 | 4.0 | 16 | 3.6 |
| Native American | 7 | 1.9 | 8 | 1.8 |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 25 | 6.6 | 35 | 7.8 |
| Mixed | 110 | 29.2 | 133 | 29.7 |
| Don’t know | 6 | 1.6 | 1 | 0.2 |
Fig. 1Significant (p ≤ 0.05) haplotype sliding window results for fetal growth and body size regulation genes and childhood ALL. Outlined blocks show a 6-SNP haplotype association for IGF1 (p = 0.002), a 3-SNP haplotype association for IGF2 (p = 0.037), and different but overlapping 3-SNP haplotype associations for IGF2R in Hispanics and non-Hispanics. The 6-SNP haplotype association observed for IGF2R among non-Hispanics was driven by rare haplotypes among controls (<5 % frequency) and therefore not considered further
Haplotype trend regression results: fetal growth and body size regulation genes in childhood ALL risk, NCCLS
| Gene | SNPs | Ethnic group | Haplotype | Control frequencya | Case frequencya | OR (95 % CI) |
| Global |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ( | Both | Rare haplotypesd | 0.016 | 0.036 | 9.90 (2.07, 47.26) |
|
|
| A-A-C-A-G-C | 0.058 | 0.058 | 1.23 (0.51, 3.00) | 0.644 | ||||
| G-G-C-G-A-C | 0.076 | 0.106 | 2.13 (1.04, 4.35) |
| ||||
| A-A-C-G-A-A | 0.091 | 0.099 | 1.45 (0.72, 2.92) | 0.304 | ||||
| A-A-A-A-G-C | 0.138 | 0.168 | 1.81 (1.02, 3.22) |
| ||||
| G-G-C-G-G-C | 0.200 | 0.153 | 0.72 (0.41, 1.28) | 0.268 | ||||
| A-A-C-G-G-C | 0.420 | 0.379 | 1.00 (ref) | |||||
|
|
| Hisp | Rare haplotypesd | 0.024 | 0.049 | 9.34 (1.09, 80.14) |
|
|
| G-G-C | 0.053 | 0.080 | 2.92 (0.72, 11.90) | 0.134 | ||||
| A-G-A | 0.148 | 0.194 | 2.34 (1.00, 5.48) |
| ||||
| G-A-A | 0.226 | 0.216 | 1.30 (0.57, 2.98) | 0.538 | ||||
| G-A-C | 0.549 | 0.461 | 1.00 (ref) | |||||
|
|
| Hisp | G-C-A | 0.086 | 0.087 | 1.25 (0.41–3.80) | 0.697 |
|
| A-A-A | 0.095 | 0.048 | 0.29 (0.05–1.79) | 0.184 | ||||
| A-C-G | 0.271 | 0.340 | 2.10 (0.98–4.53) |
| ||||
| A-C-A | 0.549 | 0.525 | 1.00 (ref) | |||||
|
|
| NH | Rare haplotypesd | 0.013 | 0.039 | 9.69 (1.64, 57.34) |
|
|
| A-A-G | 0.095 | 0.133 | 2.34 (1.02, 5.36) |
| ||||
| C-G-G | 0.201 | 0.172 | 0.82 (0.44, 1.52) | 0.520 | ||||
| C-A-A | 0.691 | 0.656 | 1.00 (ref) |
a377 childhood ALL cases, 448 controls
bWald test; bold type indicates significant results
cGlobal test for haplotype association; bold type indicates significant results
dIncludes any haplotypes with less than 5 % frequency among controls
Childhood ALL risk estimates for putative functional SNPs in fetal growth and body size regulation genes, NCCLS
| Gene | SNP | Both ethnicities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| OR (95 % CI) |
|
|
| |||
|
| rs35767 | (LD with functional microsatellite) | ||||||
| GG | 217 | 300 | 1.00 (ref) |
| 0.3190 | |||
| AG | 140 | 131 | 1.48 (1.1, 1.99) |
| ||||
| AA | 20 | 16 | 1.74 (0.88, 3.45) | 0.111 | ||||
|
| rs629849 | (G1619R) | ||||||
| GG | 308 | 356 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.376 | 0.1920 | |||
| AG | 63 | 78 | 0.94 (0.65, 1.35) | 0.720 | ||||
| AA | 1 | 5 | 0.23 (0.03, 1.97) | 0.179 | ||||
|
| rs4684677 | (Q78L) | ||||||
| TT | 273 | 333 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.231 | 0.8245 | |||
| AT | 83 | 99 | 1.03 (0.72, 1.47) | 0.880 | ||||
| AA | 17 | 10 | 2.11 (0.93, 4.79) | 0.074 | ||||
|
| rs696217 | (L60M) | ||||||
| CC | 322 | 370 | 1.00 (ref) | 0.325 | 0.5753 | |||
| AC | 49 | 68 | 0.83 (0.56, 1.24) | 0.365 | ||||
| AA | 1 | 2 | 0.59 (0.05, 6.58) | 0.669 | ||||
aWald test p value; bold type indicates significant results
bLog additive inheritance model; bold type indicates significant results
cLikelihood ratio test p value for interaction with Hispanic status