Literature DB >> 22878897

Perception by family members and ICU staff of the quality of dying and death in the ICU: a prospective multicenter study in The Netherlands.

Rik T Gerritsen1, José G M Hofhuis2, Matty Koopmans3, Meta van der Woude4, Laura Bormans4, Aly Hovingh2, Peter E Spronk5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Admission to the ICU is a major event in a patient’s life and also for family members. We tried to elucidate how family members and ICU caregivers experience the dying process of their patients.
METHODS: The prospective study took place in three Dutch ICUs. Patients who had stayed . 48 h and died in the ICU were eligible. The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) questionnaire was used, with addition of items pertaining to the patient’s autonomy. Values indicate median and interquartile range.
RESULTS: We included 100 consecutive patients. ICU stay before death was 8 (3-16) days. APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II score at admission was 24 (19-31). Family response rate was 89%. Families were satisfied with overall QODD (score, 8 [7-9]) and felt supported by the ICU caregivers (8 [7-9]). Pain control was scored lower by family members (8 [5.75- 8.25]) than by nurses and physicians (9 [8-10], P 5 .024) Almost always, physicians discussed the patient’s end-of-life wishes with family members, although families rated the quality of the discussion lower (7 [5.5-8.5]) than physicians (9 [6.5-10]) ( P 5 .045). The majority of the families (89%) felt included in the decision-making process. More than one-half of the family members (57%) believed that the physician made the fi nal decision alone after giving information, whereas 36.8% believed they had participated in making the decision. Family members rated the QODD questionnaire as difficult (6 [5-8]), and several items were not answered by a majority of family members.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality of dying and death is generally perceived to be good by family members and caregivers of patients who die in Dutch ICUs. There is a need for modification of the QODD questionnaire for the European ICU population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22878897     DOI: 10.1378/chest.12-0569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  16 in total

1.  The quality of dying and death: is it ready for use as an outcome measure?

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Enhancing informed decision making: is more information always better?

Authors:  Ann C Long; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Keeping the patient in the center: Common challenges in the practice of shared decision making.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fisher; Andy S L Tan; Daniel D Matlock; Barry Saver; Kathleen M Mazor; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-08-06

4.  Assessment of an Instrument to Measure Interdisciplinary Staff Perceptions of Quality of Dying and Death in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Valerie Bailey; Dorothy M Beke; Jennifer M Snaman; Faraz Alizadeh; Sarah Goldberg; Melissa Smith-Parrish; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Elizabeth D Blume; Katie M Moynihan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  Defining a standard set of patient-centred outcomes for lung cancer.

Authors:  Kimberley S Mak; Annelotte C M van Bommel; Caleb Stowell; Janet L Abrahm; Matthew Baker; Clarissa S Baldotto; David R Baldwin; Diana Borthwick; David P Carbone; Aileen B Chen; Jesme Fox; Tom Haswell; Marianna Koczywas; Benjamin D Kozower; Reza J Mehran; Franz M Schramel; Suresh Senan; Robert G Stirling; Jan P van Meerbeeck; Michel W J M Wouters; Michael D Peake
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  The quality of dying and death for patients in intensive care units: a single center pilot study.

Authors:  Yanghwan Choi; Myoungrin Park; Da Hyun Kang; Jooseon Lee; Jae Young Moon; Heejoon Ahn
Journal:  Acute Crit Care       Date:  2019-04-08

7.  The value of nonoperative versus operative treatment of frail institutionalized elderly patients with a proximal femoral fracture in the shade of life (FRAIL-HIP); protocol for a multicenter observational cohort study.

Authors:  Pieter Joosse; Sverre A I Loggers; C L P Marc Van de Ree; Romke Van Balen; Jeroen Steens; Rutger G Zuurmond; Taco Gosens; Sven H Van Helden; Suzanne Polinder; Hanna C Willems; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Intensive Care Unit death and factors influencing family satisfaction of Intensive Care Unit care.

Authors:  Naveen Salins; Jayita Deodhar; Mary Ann Muckaden
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02

9.  Satisfaction with quality of ICU care for patients and families: the euroQ2 project.

Authors:  Hanne Irene Jensen; Rik T Gerritsen; Matty Koopmans; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; Peter E Spronk; Jan G Zijlstra; Helle Ørding
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Developing and testing a nurse-led intervention to support bereavement in relatives in the intensive care (BRIC study): a protocol of a pre-post intervention study.

Authors:  Margo M C van Mol; Sebastian Wagener; Jos M Latour; Paul A Boelen; Peter E Spronk; Corstiaan A den Uil; Judith A C Rietjens
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.