Literature DB >> 22878671

Perioperative complications of anterior cervical decompression with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a retrospective, multi-institutional study.

Atsushi Kimura1, Atsushi Seichi, Yuichi Hoshino, Masashi Yamazaki, Macondo Mochizuki, Atsuomi Aiba, Tsuyoshi Kato, Kenzo Uchida, Kei Miyamoto, Shinnosuke Nakahara, Shinichirou Taniguchi, Masashi Neo, Toshihiko Taguchi, Kenji Endo, Masahiko Watanabe, Masahito Takahashi, Takashi Kaito, Hirotaka Chikuda, Takahito Fujimori, Takui Ito, Atsushi Ono, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Kei Yamada, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Yoshiaki Toyama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is reportedly associated with a higher incidence of complications than is laminoplasty. However, the frequency of perioperative complications associated with ADF for cervical OPLL has not been fully established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of perioperative complications, especially neurological complications, following ADF performed to relieve compressive cervical myelopathy due to cervical OPLL.
METHODS: Study participants comprised 150 patients who had undergone ADF for cervical OPLL at 27 institutions between 2005 and 2008. Perioperative--especially neurological--complications occurring within 2 weeks after ADF were analyzed. Preoperative imaging findings, including Cobb angle, between C2 and C7 and occupying ratio of OPLL were investigated. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for neurological complications. RESULT: Three patients (2.0 %) showed deterioration of lower-extremity function after ADF. One of the three patients had not regained their preoperative level of function 6 months after surgery. Upper-extremity paresis occurred in 20 patients (13.3 %), five of whom had not returned to preoperative levels 6 months after surgery. Patients with upper-extremity paresis showed significantly higher occupying ratios of OPLL, greater blood loss, longer operation times, fusion of more segments, and higher rates of cerebrospinal fluid leakage than those without paresis. Independent risk factors for upper-extremity paresis were a high occupying ratio of OPLL and large blood loss during surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidences of deterioration in upper- and lower-extremity functions were 13.3 % and 2.0 %, respectively. Patients with a high occupying ratio of OPLL are at higher risk of developing neurological deterioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22878671     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-012-0271-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Masao Koda; Makondo Mochizuki; Hiroaki Konishi; Atsuomi Aiba; Ryo Kadota; Taigo Inada; Koshiro Kamiya; Mitsutoshi Ota; Satoshi Maki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Chikato Mannoji; Takeo Furuya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A new method to determine whether ossified posterior longitudinal ligament can be resected completely and safely: spinal canal "Rule of Nine" on axial computed tomography.

Authors:  Haisong Yang; Xuhua Lu; Xinwei Wang; Deyu Chen; Wen Yuan; Lili Yang; Yang Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Posterior instrumented fusion suppresses the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a comparison of laminoplasty with and without instrumented fusion by three-dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Keiichi Katsumi; Tomohiro Izumi; Takui Ito; Toru Hirano; Kei Watanabe; Masayuki Ohashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Modified K-line for Making Decisions Regarding the Surgical Approach in Patients with K-line (-) OPLL.

Authors:  Xizhe Liu; Bizhi Tan; Bin Xiao; Xuenong Zou; Shaoyu Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Significance of Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy as a Surgical Strategy for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Dong-Ho Lee; Sehan Park; Chul Gie Hong; Shinseok Kim; Jae Hwan Cho; Chang Ju Hwang; Jae Jun Yang; Choon Sung Lee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23

Review 6.  Surgical interventions for cervical spondylosis due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Di Wu; Cheng-Zhao Liu; Hao Yang; Hua Li; Nan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: A meta-analysis for last decade.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Xiao-Ming Tian; Si-Kai Liu; Hui Wang; Ying-Ze Zhang; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Intraoperative evaluation using mobile computed tomography in anterior cervical decompression with floating method for massive ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Toshitaka Yoshii; Takashi Hirai; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Hiroyuki Inose; Tsuyoshi Kato; Kenichiro Sakai; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Shigenori Kawabata; Yoshiyasu Arai; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Hiroaki Nakashima; So Kato; Michael Kryshtalskyj; Nagoshi Nagoshi; Aria Nouri; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-08-15

10.  A Modified Laminoplasty Technique to Treat Cervical Myelopathy Secondary to Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL).

Authors:  Jy Jia; Wc Chen; Libiao Xu; Tianlong Wu; Xigao Cheng
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.