Literature DB >> 22878141

Speedy skeletal prototype production to help diagnosis in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Methodology and examples of clinical applications.

E Debarre1, P Hivart, D Baranski, P Déprez.   

Abstract

As a medical imaging complement, a real 3D replica of the anatomical area of interest can be of substantial advantage in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Unlike the 3D virtual, it makes palpable the notion of scale and volume, and apparent hidden or ambiguous details and thus enhance or facilitate the diagnosis and eventual surgical solutions. CT data of patients, in DICOM3 standard, were used for digital 3D reconstruction followed by rapid prototyping (fused deposition modelling) of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) replicas of the areas of interest. Three applications were realized: osteotomy for epiphyseal malunion, shoulder arthroplasty and femoral trochleoplasty. The actual size replicas (obtained in less than thirty hours) provided excellent spatial representation with estimation of available bone stock and materialization of relief. The process has proven to be appropriate (and economically reasonable), including for common cases, when it comes to complex spatial geometry and objective representation of the scale of volumes.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22878141     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  3 in total

Review 1.  [3D printing in orthopedic and trauma surgery education and training : Possibilities and fields of application].

Authors:  Simon Weidert; Sebastian Andress; Eduardo Suero; Christopher Becker; Maximilian Hartel; Maren Behle; Christian Willy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions - A 21st Century Perspective.

Authors:  Jan Henkel; Maria A Woodruff; Devakara R Epari; Roland Steck; Vaida Glatt; Ian C Dickinson; Peter F M Choong; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Error Analysis: How Precise is Fused Deposition Modeling in Fabrication of Bone Models in Comparison to the Parent Bones?

Authors:  M V Reddy; Krishnakiran Eachempati; A V Gurava Reddy; Aakash Mugalur
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.