BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Determination of hemispheric language dominance is critical for planning epilepsy surgery. We assess the usefulness of spatiotemporal source analysis of magnetoencephalography for determining language laterality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with epilepsy were studied. The patients performed a semantic word-processing task during MEG recording. Epochs containing language-related neuromagnetic activity were averaged after preprocessing. The averaged data between 250 and 550 ms after stimulus were analyzed by using dynamic statistical parametric mapping. ROIs were obtained in the opercular and triangular parts of the inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and supramarginal gyrus in both hemispheres. We calculated laterality indices according to 1) dSPM-amplitude method, based on the amplitude of activation in the ROIs, and 2) dSPM-counting method, based on the number of unit dipoles with activation over a threshold in the ROIs. The threshold was determined as half of the maximum value in all ROIs for each patient. A LI ≥0.10 or ≤-0.10 was considered left- or right-hemisphere dominance, respectively; a LI between -0.10 and 0.10 was considered bilateral. All patients underwent an intracarotid amobarbital procedure as part of presurgical evaluation. RESULTS: The dSPM-counting method demonstrated laterality consistent with the IAP in 32 of 35 patients (91.4%), the remaining 3 (8.6%) demonstrated bilateral language representation, whereas the dSPM-amplitude method showed 18 (51.4%) concordant and 17 (48.6%) bilateral. No laterality opposite to the IAP was found. CONCLUSIONS: Spatiotemporal mapping of language lateralization with the dSPM-counting method may reduce the necessity for an IAP in as many as 90% of patients.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Determination of hemispheric language dominance is critical for planning epilepsy surgery. We assess the usefulness of spatiotemporal source analysis of magnetoencephalography for determining language laterality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with epilepsy were studied. The patients performed a semantic word-processing task during MEG recording. Epochs containing language-related neuromagnetic activity were averaged after preprocessing. The averaged data between 250 and 550 ms after stimulus were analyzed by using dynamic statistical parametric mapping. ROIs were obtained in the opercular and triangular parts of the inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and supramarginal gyrus in both hemispheres. We calculated laterality indices according to 1) dSPM-amplitude method, based on the amplitude of activation in the ROIs, and 2) dSPM-counting method, based on the number of unit dipoles with activation over a threshold in the ROIs. The threshold was determined as half of the maximum value in all ROIs for each patient. A LI ≥0.10 or ≤-0.10 was considered left- or right-hemisphere dominance, respectively; a LI between -0.10 and 0.10 was considered bilateral. All patients underwent an intracarotid amobarbital procedure as part of presurgical evaluation. RESULTS: The dSPM-counting method demonstrated laterality consistent with the IAP in 32 of 35 patients (91.4%), the remaining 3 (8.6%) demonstrated bilateral language representation, whereas the dSPM-amplitude method showed 18 (51.4%) concordant and 17 (48.6%) bilateral. No laterality opposite to the IAP was found. CONCLUSIONS: Spatiotemporal mapping of language lateralization with the dSPM-counting method may reduce the necessity for an IAP in as many as 90% of patients.
Authors: Warren S Merrifield; Panagiotis G Simos; Andrew C Papanicolaou; Linda M Philpott; William W Sutherling Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2006-12-12 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Susan M Bowyer; John E Moran; Barbara J Weiland; Karen M Mason; Margaret L Greenwald; Brien J Smith; Gregory L Barkley; Norman Tepley Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Andrew C Papanicolaou; Panagiotis G Simos; Eduardo M Castillo; Joshua I Breier; Shirin Sarkari; Ekaterina Pataraia; Rebecca L Billingsley; Scott Buchanan; James Wheless; Vijayalakshmi Maggio; William W Maggio Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Carrie R McDonald; Thomas Thesen; Donald J Hagler; Chad Carlson; Orrin Devinksy; Rubin Kuzniecky; William Barr; Lusineh Gharapetian; Amy Trongnetrpunya; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Naoaki Tanaka; Jurriaan M Peters; Anna K Prohl; Shigetoshi Takaya; Joseph R Madsen; Blaise F Bourgeois; Barbara A Dworetzky; Matti S Hämäläinen; Steven M Stufflebeam Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Naoaki Tanaka; Christos Papadelis; Eleonora Tamilia; Joseph R Madsen; Phillip L Pearl; Steven M Stufflebeam Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Roozbeh Rezaie; Shalini Narayana; Katherine Schiller; Liliya Birg; James W Wheless; Frederick A Boop; Andrew C Papanicolaou Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.169