Literature DB >> 22876086

Evaluation of an adult insulin infusion protocol at an academic medical center.

Katerina I Petrov, Tammy L Burns, Andjela Drincic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Acknowledging evidence of possible detrimental effects of tightly controlled blood glucose levels, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Diabetes Association published a consensus statement recommending less strict control for most diabetic patients. As a result of these recommendations, our academic center at Creighton University Medical Center revised its adult insulin infusion protocol to target blood glucose levels ranging from 120 to 180 mg/dL for regular (standard) glycemic control and 80 to 120 mg/dL for tight control; previous targets had ranged from 80 to 180 mg/dL and 70 to 110 mg/dL, respectively. The primary objective was to evaluate the time that blood glucose values were within the target range for patients receiving the new protocol, compared with patients receiving the previous protocol.
METHODS: Our study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the revised protocol. Using a retrospective chart review, we collected data for 4 months from patients on the old insulin protocol (May to August 2009) and for 4 months from patients on the new protocol (September to December 2009). Secondary endpoints included the number of hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose below 70 mg/dL) and severe hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose 40 mg/dL or lower) experienced by patients receiving the new insulin protocol compared with those receiving the former protocol.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar at baseline. Blood glucose values stayed within the target range for a significantly shorter time with the new protocol than with the former protocol (44.6% vs. 56.8%, respectively; P < 0.001), probably because of the narrower target range in the revised protocol. No statistically significant differences in hypoglycemia were observed after the protocol was changed. Hypoglycemia occurred in 31% of the former-protocol patients compared with 18% of the revised-protocol patients. Severe hypoglycemia was experienced by 2.1% of patients on the old protocol and by 3.1% of patients on the new protocol. Rates of severe hypoglycemia were low (2.6%) with the original protocol.
CONCLUSION: Patients' blood glucose levels were within the target range for a shorter time with the new protocol. Fewer episodes of hypoglycemia were recorded with the new protocol, but rates of severe hypoglycemia were similar with both protocols.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22876086      PMCID: PMC3411221     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P T        ISSN: 1052-1372


  11 in total

1.  Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G van den Berghe; P Wouters; F Weekers; C Verwaest; F Bruyninckx; M Schetz; D Vlasselaers; P Ferdinande; P Lauwers; R Bouillon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU.

Authors:  Greet Van den Berghe; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Hermans; Wouter Meersseman; Pieter J Wouters; Ilse Milants; Eric Van Wijngaerden; Herman Bobbaers; Roger Bouillon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control.

Authors:  Etie S Moghissi; Mary T Korytkowski; Monica DiNardo; Daniel Einhorn; Richard Hellman; Irl B Hirsch; Silvio E Inzucchi; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; M Sue Kirkman; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Dean R Chittock; Steve Yu-Shuo Su; Deborah Blair; Denise Foster; Vinay Dhingra; Rinaldo Bellomo; Deborah Cook; Peter Dodek; William R Henderson; Paul C Hébert; Stephane Heritier; Daren K Heyland; Colin McArthur; Ellen McDonald; Imogen Mitchell; John A Myburgh; Robyn Norton; Julie Potter; Bruce G Robinson; Juan J Ronco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Preiser; Philippe Devos; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Christian Mélot; Djillali Annane; Johan Groeneveld; Gaetano Iapichino; Xavier Leverve; Gérard Nitenberg; Pierre Singer; Jan Wernerman; Michael Joannidis; Adela Stecher; René Chioléro
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Continuous intravenous insulin infusion reduces the incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients after cardiac surgical procedures.

Authors:  A P Furnary; K J Zerr; G L Grunkemeier; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  American College of Endocrinology and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient diabetes and glycemic control.

Authors: 
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Insulin therapy for critically ill hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Anastassios G Pittas; Richard D Siegel; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-10-11

9.  Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Daniel C Wiener; Robin J Larson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis.

Authors:  Frank M Brunkhorst; Christoph Engel; Frank Bloos; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Max Ragaller; Norbert Weiler; Onnen Moerer; Matthias Gruendling; Michael Oppert; Stefan Grond; Derk Olthoff; Ulrich Jaschinski; Stefan John; Rolf Rossaint; Tobias Welte; Martin Schaefer; Peter Kern; Evelyn Kuhnt; Michael Kiehntopf; Christiane Hartog; Charles Natanson; Markus Loeffler; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Nurse-Managed Insulin Infusion Protocol.

Authors:  Andrea J Passarelli; Haley Gibbs; Annette M Rowden; Leigh Efird; Elizabeth Zink; Nestoras Mathioudakis
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.118

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.